Tactile Immersion - General Discussion - Hardware & Software

Atak_Kat --- As for the mats, scroll back a few dozen pages - Mr Latte got into some mat options and info. I think it is key to note that isolation is NOT just for the rig to the floor. Yes, that matters especially for quieting your setup, but you may consider isolation mounts to separate your seat from your frame, maybe your pedal plate from the frame, etc.

I think you will find that just smashing some foam between things and bolting solid will not really isolate. It may dampen some sound, but it will not (for example) allow you to target say your seat with tactile vs trying to shake your entire rig. It has been proven that it is much more efficient to isolate and shake individual components.
 
So I have built my setup with the following:

- 1 x Behringer EPQ304 amp
- 4 x Dayton Audio DAEX32EP-4
- 1 x Nobsound HiFi NS-20G Mini
- 1 x Sinustec BS-250

Everything is upp and running! I have put the 4 Dayton shakers in 4 corners of my 80/20 rig. The two front ones on each side of my Heusinkveld pedals and the two rear next to the seat. The BS-250 sits under the seat. I have got a pretty good grip on the SimHub ShakeIt software and how it works. I really like the White Noise setting for many of the different inputs, as it gives a bit of roughness as in real life:) It would be great to see what settings people use in general and what frequencies for each of the inducers. I found MrLatte test thread and used those settings as a base. But he uses a more serious setup with many inducers and amps and layers of data. For us mere mortals with only 2 to 6 inducers it would be helpful if we could share settings. Maybe starting a new thread with only SimHub settings? What do you guys think?
 
Can I ask how are people managing running their tactile alongside surround sound speaker systems? I have a Creative omni 5.1 USB sound card with a 4 channel Amp & 4 x tactile exciters running from it. Looking to add a surround sound system for when I am not playing in VR. Can a splitter be used?
 
Can I ask how are people managing running their tactile alongside surround sound speaker systems? I have a Creative omni 5.1 USB sound card with a 4 channel Amp & 4 x tactile exciters running from it. Looking to add a surround sound system for when I am not playing in VR. Can a splitter be used?
I use my on board Realtek sound card for surround sound.
 
So I have built my setup with the following:

- 1 x Behringer EPQ304 amp
- 4 x Dayton Audio DAEX32EP-4
- 1 x Nobsound HiFi NS-20G Mini
- 1 x Sinustec BS-250

Everything is upp and running! I have put the 4 Dayton shakers in 4 corners of my 80/20 rig. The two front ones on each side of my Heusinkveld pedals and the two rear next to the seat. The BS-250 sits under the seat. I have got a pretty good grip on the SimHub ShakeIt software and how it works. I really like the White Noise setting for many of the different inputs, as it gives a bit of roughness as in real life:) It would be great to see what settings people use in general and what frequencies for each of the inducers. I found MrLatte test thread and used those settings as a base. But he uses a more serious setup with many inducers and amps and layers of data. For us mere mortals with only 2 to 6 inducers it would be helpful if we could share settings. Maybe starting a new thread with only SimHub settings? What do you guys think?

Well congrats on getting things up and running.
Will you please shage images of how you installed your units to let us see exactly how you did this.

Concerns:
We need to help people ensure they use these "exciters" in a way that gets the full energy from them, especially as they are so small. My fear is people often rush ahead and do what they want anyway and I am a bit concerned what you mean by saying "4 corners" of your rig for the Dayton recommended exciters.

My query is, why would you do that? If you are going to buy the recommended hardware, why then not also follow the advice for installations? Why do people seek help then just do what they want anyways prior to confirming what their plans are?

Apologies if I miss-read what you stated. It appears by what you have said, you have taken the "recommended exciters" and applied them to a conventional "4 corners" type installation with a central unit on a seat for other effects.

So if this is right, basically you're mimicking a Simvibe CM and EM installation approach that many people use or have done for years. Yet if comparing, 4 corners is not suited to all rigs and can be overrated but most people with it do not even consider much or bother with good vibration control. Nor do they take into account isolation factors as the idea seems to be to let the vibrations travel freely even in mono as *(multi-dimensional) all over the rig like it is a real car.

Hold that thought for a second, this is not the same as a rig specifically trying to use (multi-channels) with control of the effects being output, their placement and how/where they interact with the body. For in this scenario being shared, those channels will have specific effects roles or effect layers detailing. As in this approach, we can help enhance positional placement from effects or better deliver the spread of effects faster and more accurately over a body.

So if using these exciters just like conventional installations, what you are not doing is following the advice in "how we extract" the gains we can achieve when running "multiple effects" and using the "exciters" in a multichannel configuration. Then to at some point let a user upgrade and/or combine with them the larger BK units that will use their own specific effect layers.

I have to ask, why would you place low energy 40w, tiny exciters to the "corners" assuming it is the main 8020 rig/regions?


Search Thread / Seek Answers / Learn The Basics First
In dozens of responses over several pages these exciters have been recommended for "direct installation" for "body-regions" primarily with the focus on the seat. I know I have focused on the seat with using these in multiple sets but its for good reason. Of course, some people (may know better) in how to achieve excellent tactile with their urgency and desire to rush in having tactile in pedals and seat before we ensure the seat gets the best energy/detailing or has the operational benefits that multi-channels with several units and multi-body regions can bring. Is it not clear already how or why the seat should be the primary focus first?

Lots of discussions have been made regards "seat" or "pedal" regions using isolators for the purpose of "isolating those as platforms" separated from the main rig. The reason for this is to reduce the size of the section getting the direct vibrations but also to have the direct energy from the tactile maintained better within them.

Weight/Mass?
I do not personally believe weight is a big factor (while mentioned by some) for sim racing. Well not in regards a direct mounted tactile installation, as our bodies are then right next to the unit's installed location and primary energy. In such an installation, (if done right) its energy has to penetrate through us before it can escape elsewhere.

This is the opposite of 4 corners, as with the corners the energy has to travel to the user bringing delay/loss of detail and loss of energy. These will all factor before it will reach the user. So only after dispersing most of its energy to other regions and with no control of its primary energy and detail being delivered where it is needed most, the user. It also does nothing to encourage feeling positional left/right effects enter the correct side of the body, them enhancing the positional or directional energy these effects may contain. Having this work well is like having motion with tactile but very few rigs implement or attempt to do this well.


Its Not Just About Watts & Mass
If we are trying to vibrate a large 3 seater couch or an office chair, those are very different sized objects and require very different applications to deliver sufficiently felt tactile energy. With most "Sim Rigs" we are talking about a seat encompassing a users body/torso and a pedal region for their feet. The rest of the frame should not be deemed important.

Folks, these are not big areas to focus on in comparison to example usage case perspectives Buttkicker use for weight/mass and what models to possibly purchase to suit these. Those may be relating to home cinema installations and vibrations covering the larger mass of seating/furniture with up to multiple people. Sofas also have soft furnishings and dampening materials. A 3-4 seater is a great deal more mass and why such would benefit from multiple units installed to cover that mass or why a user would opt for a larger BK unit to a smaller one.

It is, however, absolute bollocks to give people the impression a Mini Lfe covers the same operating frequency range as a large BK unit and the only difference in them is the wattage. Therefore the perspective given is that if you only have a small seat/mass or region to vibrate each unit will perform similarly and the small one will be enough anyways.


BK Official Advice?
I know for a fact-based on past communication with representatives at Buttkicker (several years ago) they use this approach on recommendations for what hardware should be purchased. Yet the real-world performance abilities and in particular as we use even more usage of the lowest frequencies via (Tone Generation Software) than music or movies typically have. It is vital and a major difference in performance between the Mini and full-size models. This is even on a single seat as the larger unit with heavier piston just performs much better in its abilities to extract the lowest frequencies. Even if you used a large BK unit for a single pedal/foot region it would bring benefits with the low bass. So do not look upon mass or size of region/section you are placing tactile as the only deciding factor to determine how big the unit used should be. Let's be clear, we may not need anything close to the full wattage potential of the large units, but the immersion is in feeling the lowest frequencies with good energy and that's what the smaller units struggle with and ALL entry-level or budget tactile cannot deliver.

Also with home cinema, it relies on a single LFE channel, this is NOT what we are doing with SimHub. We often will want multiple channels with multiple effects on those channels to all to be felt working but each effect to be felt individually. Single units cannot achieve this properly. This is why I keep stating the importance, improved effects detailing and more achievable or advanced immersion is attainable with multiple units and multiple body-zones and why they should seriously be considered over other common installations.

Those that seek to install 4 corner conventional type installations are either just ignoring these benefits or being ignorant to the various information/testing and experimentation done with such a new approach or concept and its new ways in approaching how we better control, develop and use effects. It really is underestimated in what potential Simhub has opened and I can't think or have found a better working solution.


Isolation Usage: Maintain Energy / Reduce Vibrations Below
Dual purposes are common, really its to help prevent leakage and loss of energy or detailing from the vibrations go to other areas or regions of the rig. Also to help reduce vibrational noise where it is a problem or concern for other rooms/adjoining buildings.

You feel the energy via your body contact, so tactile going to various places on the rig with no body contact are wasted. A unit installed in a corner region has to send those vibrations to your seat via whatever connecting surfaces/materials you have along that path and it will be free to go in any direction down any connecting surface. It is far from ideal but it still is what most people do based on the idea that the 4 units represent the car's suspension/wheels and they need to be at the corners. In theory that seems a good approach in real use it's not. Direct energy from the unit to the user is what will bring better results but we still have to be aware of reverb, vibration noise, controlled wattages, not overdriving units and using frequencies that get the best out of the hardware installed.

If you have units attached to a surface and that surface also makes direct contact with the rigs main frame surface materials then you are letting the energy freely transfer and its energy disperse out to places you will not feel it. People also commonly with corners installations then drive the units installed harder to try and feel what energy they are delivering. Therefore the units are not operating perhaps as composed as they could be if directly installed and with a more controlled volume/gain.

NOTE:
The Discussed Concept Is Not Just About Using Exciters Or Buttkickers & Installing Them In Conventional Ways
Nor Does It Rely On Conventional Methods For Creating Or Distributing Effects


Follow The Plan Vs Do What You Want
The concept I have shared does not work in part, you or others may not want to achieve what it offers, thats fair enough, or not everyone will want to do things as recommended and to each persons "it's your own rig". The approach you have taken (as described) with placing 4 exciters in corners (without seeing it) I do have to question if that is a good thing with those exciters? Nor do I know what your future plans are or to install other BK units at a later time.

My own recommendations combine specifically selected hardware, to be installed in a unique approach and for that hardware to work together for the benefits it brings. Its a tried and tested method based on many hours of research and past tests. These choosen units are to use specific effect layers to operate in a combined way. Going past the operation limitations of single units. It is very different to typical installations and how typical installations rely on single units operation and performances. The idea being shared, was that I can help show/teach people how I found making effects to work with the concepts installation approach and the benefits it brings over the typical or common methods used. It just requires having a small group of people with the hardware and it installed in the appropriate way. Then, it's about making excellent use of the created effects (how they operate) and the benefits of also having multi-channels over the body and importantly if seeking the best performance the full 1-200Hz range available to use in effects tone generation.


Nice Hardware / Wrong Application?
I have never recommended the exciters to be used on anything other than the seat for direct effects contact. As that is what so far all my own experimentation with them has been for. As yet I cannot comment on how well they can be used in pedals never mind being further away in 4 corners of a rigs main frame. Thats not to say people can't buy them and do their own things....

I just want people to take on board that if they are installed in different ways or used not in the way intended/recommended then I cant ensure they will offer good results.


Why Share Such Findings?
Let's look back over the last few months, regards the shared concept I discuss.
Some have, opted for different hardware, sought to improve on the recommendations, questioned the hardware recommended or decided not to follow the installation guidelines. This includes the importance of a suitable seat. Some opted to instead do their own thing, before even testing for themselves the recommended path. I do not know of a single person that has an operational and installed configuration as it is recommended. One that is making use of both multi-channels in the seat and with large BK units installed.

Its not a personal attack to anyone but I am scunnered sharing this concept and trying to convince people of it. I continue to work and test towards my own rig using the same principles but in a more elaborate way.

Long Time Passed
Perhaps eventually we can have some members decide to go with the correct hardware and install it as recommended. Not doubting or questioning things, not bringing their own untested ideas. Maybe they even seek help to install the correct way before just running with their own ideas or they are willing to do a thread on such a build in a step by step way with the recommended hardware.

So, it would actually be good and nice for me to see someone/anyone be able to give their evaluation and opinions in how well it performs when also using some specifically made effects. Even someone to be able to share with others what they have experienced in the past with tactile to how it performs.
 
Last edited:
Here is a couple of images of my setup
Riggen-1 (Large).jpg
Riggen-3 (Large).jpg


When I wrote that I found your thread and used those settings, I meant the thread where you test settings in SimHub, not this thread. You get a lot of appraise from most people here on the forum for your dedication. But everyone is free to use the advice to their liking's and do their own tests. So please don't take offense for a friendly and simple question about a topic I have found very little information on after hours of searching the internet.

I just wanted a small affordable solution that would add a little more immersion. And I can honestly say it did just that:) The reason I did it this way is several reasons:

- I do not have the passion and economy to go as deep as you in the world of sound and tactile induction. Instead I choose to invest in a DD wheel and Heusinkveld pedals that truly changed the world of Sim Racing for me! In fact to such a degree I am now a long way into opening my own Sim racing store online as I basically have become obsessed at 49 years of age:)
- I do not have a seat with a hard shell to mount the shakers on. So setting it up in that way is just not an option at the moment.
- This is just the first test. I have mounted everything on easy to move plates that will go anywhere on my 80/20 profiles if I am not happy with the current placement. I know the rig will absorb a lot of the vibration and dissipate them throughout the rig. I moved the front shakers next to the pedals as I wanted to try to get some feedback when braking and slowing down, which I think it does! Could it be better? I am sure it can!

As I drive cars in my normal line of work I made a conscious decision years ago about staying within or close to the speed limits at all times, as I got way too many tickets in my younger years. However, since taking up sim racing I have found myself driving way faster than in a long time and I have started to look for break points and apexes all the time!:) I also have been trying to feel what is going on with the car when breaking, accelerating , turning and so on, as I want to try to replicate this a little bit with the speakers. As I wrote, I used some of the frequencies you tested for the different effects in the other thread. And I feel they work pretty good on my rig! But, as we do not have the same kind of setup and I can not layer the feedback with my equipment in the way you can with yours, I am sure things can be improved upon. I just wanted to know if people here have found suitable frequencies and settings for all the effects. This is also why I wrote that a new thread dedicated to SimHub settings might be a good idea, so not to clutter up this one.
 
Thanks for showing and confirming how you positioned and installed the exciters.
So it is as I assumed and yeah I see several issues or things that could of been avoided or improved if only you had asked or made clear what/how you intended to do things.

I had started to write more but why bother as its been said many times before.

Do not take any offense from this post and I'm not taking offense from your post at all, you can see in other posts as well that people will often do just about everything but what the recommended things to do are. I am well used to giving people advice and they do something else or they have something better planned with no idea really what they are doing. Tactile is one of those things you learn from experience but few want to spend time experimenting, testing and instead slap it on and it all work wonderfully.

Possibly they often want it to be simple, just as you mention, they want to do as they please with their rigs and some it appears don't want to look too hard for information on the topic, even when plenty of it is available from several users here. ;)
 
Last edited:
BK Official Advice?
...real-world performance abilities and in particular as we use even more usage of the lowest frequencies via (Tone Generation Software) than music or movies typically have. It is vital and a major difference in performance between the Mini and full-size models.

This is even on a single seat as the larger unit with heavier piston just performs much better in its abilities to extract the lowest frequencies.

>> Even if you used a large BK unit for a single pedal/foot region it would bring benefits with the low bass.

So do not look upon mass or size of region/section you are placing tactile as the only deciding factor to determine how big the unit used should be. Let's be clear, we may not need anything close to the full wattage potential of the large units, but the immersion is in feeling the lowest frequencies with good energy and that's what the smaller units struggle with and ALL entry-level or budget tactile cannot deliver.

I wanted to repost this for emphasis. Especially this line:
>> Even if you used a large BK unit for a single pedal/foot region it would bring benefits with the low bass.

I think that is the key -- not in what you use to get there, but GETTING THERE! Don't mis-read that -- getting there meaning getting the frequency response you want/need. There are few options that seem to do well in the lowest range. BK-LFE is the cheap one. I suspect the Q10 earthquake would as well, but I've not seen anyone here test it, and I'm not dropping $600 to try one. Reviews in other uses show it responds well into the single digit Hertz range.

We have seen notes that even the TST-439's do not handle the lowest of lows. So to get them, there's one option. Buttkicker. And it seems the LFE is the better option over the concert, for low low low hertz.

The question is "where" do you want those at? And where do you want the other frequencies at? After deciding that the solution is simple. Find the unit that actually does those frequencies very well, and put them there.

Latte often is dismissive of cheap tactile. We have went circles around it. I 100% contend it has a use! But- let me be clear - that is NOT to say it is the BEST choice. Hands down, based on my testing, and his extremely thorough testing, certain units perform best. There's no doubt in my mind that you can create an AMAZING feeling utilizing 3 types of transducers: BK-LFE, TST-439, Dayton Exciters. Only issue is that not everyone can afford, or is willing to afford them, or the peripherals needed to run them the best. Which is fair! I wont likely own a complete setup with the best of the best.

So - that leaves you with a conundrum. What do I do to get the best of what I can with what I have, or am willing to buy.

Latte will tell you start with exciters on your seat. And that is probably fair...if your seat lends well to it. It absolutely is the cheapest unit 1:1 and does extremely well IN ITS INTENDED RANGE. It also can be ran easily with ultra cheap amps. The only issue is you give up ANY lower (like below 80hz) feedback. The thumps and thuds just wont be there the same way.

BUT -- and this is a big BUT -- just because one will not (for whatever reason) spend to buy the preferred units - you CAN still apply his logic.

Again - you CAN still apply his logic!

And based on his extreme testing, and what limited testing I've done - I feel confident in saying that it IS the best solution offered thus far. You will NOT get the same gusto, the same feel, etc. as what you would with a "proper" setup -- but you can utilize the concept. Cannot use a BK-LFE and TST-439 -- look at other options - but understand... you WILL NOT get the lowest bass. You will find that in ALL of Latte's research, LOW BASS IS KEY. If you don't have it, you do not get the same effect. BUT if you CANNOT have it, go get the closest you can -- and apply it using the concept.

Whether it is BK-LFE or Aura B2-4 or whatever --- the impact of placement is the same. Closer, more direct is better. Exciter to Q10, it does not matter. The less in between you and it - the more you feel. I wont recap his suggestions on where and why to put things where they are -- it's been said 100 times. I think hes right. I think that he DOES have the best suggestion on where to put things. Just keep in mind, the unit you use needs to be as similar as possible to create the effect. You wont get the same feeling from cheaper units, but you can get the most out of them following the "Latte Placement Guidelines".

Edit --- I should also say OTHERS testing as well -- Lot's of people have given feedback -- not being dismissive of that!
 
I dont think there is much difference in the LFE & CT models for how we are using them.

Well I need to look more deeply in comparison when I have both properly installed again I will do that but even then we have difference in ohm to try to contend with wattages applied.

What I will say is the CT can give really good response from under 5Hz and its not that bad going into the higher Hz on its own even though for over 60Hz we can achieve better. So I dont see any issue chooising it over an LFE for low bass.

I am not expecting people to also buy into TST units, they have a role and own performance benefits. My own rig will use them sure but the "concept shared" is about matching affordable exciters with BK units in seeking to achieve more of the 1-200Hz range as possible. Thats the key goal that most peoples sim rigs do not achieve.

Being able to enjoy multi-channel exciters in the seat for much better and more effects output with them should not be underestimated in its own immersion benefits. That is something few people here can say they have actually experimented with and made effects to fully use.

I have spent hundreds of hours on potential effects experimentation. For instance, how does a typical RPM sensation feel over 2 units or in comparison to 6 units, each pair of units with specific roles in the RPM range or also combining speed based effects on individual channels? Thats just one possible usage case scenario for more thrilling or detailed engines but we can use profiles for different scenarios or preferences as well.

Certainly, the benefits of what true low energy bass brings with BK models having their own effect layers to complement the exciters is brillant but I would not downplay how much an improvement 6 exciters on the back of a seat can be compared to say 2 rear-mounted Aura or BK Mini which are common models used by people.

Yet here we are months after such suggestions, on probably the most viewed thread about tactile anywhere and how many people can show me a seat with 6 affordable exciters installed?

Im waiting lads.....
 
Last edited:
So - would you say the following is the key progression for tactile equipment, what I am referring to as "Latte Placement Guidelines"?

So "A" is the start. The rest is just bonus, lol.

A: Pairs of Exciters attached directly to the seat. 2-4 Pairs (4-8 units) 3 pairs being ideal, wired as stereo each pair should be placed parallel. Starting at the shoulder, and working your way down to the lower lumbar. Placement can be augmented to fit the seat, including wrapping outside of the hips.



B: BK-LFE (Stereo low frequency seat effects). Two units, wired in stereo, and attached as directly to the seat as possible. Isolation of the seat is key.

[From this point - "dual role" can be added to any BK-LFE channel by adding a TST-439 and tuning appropriately.]

C: BK-LFE (MONO low frequency effects for pedals). Unless someone separates and splits their pedal set, no true benefit to stereo - but IS an option.

D: TST-439 (Stereo Mid frequency seat effects). Two units, wired in stereo, and attached as directly to the seat as possible. This is the "dual role" component where you pull the most out of both the BK and the TST working them together on shared effects. Can be a shared channel with each of the BK's or a separate stereo channel utilizing the same effects.

E: BK-LFE (MONO low frequency effects for seat). This creates a third channel for MONO only effects on the seat.



Note:
BK-LFE is suggested for Low Frequency Effects
(Concert best second choice).
TST 439 (Platinum) is suggested for Mid Frequency Effects, PAIRED with a BK-LFE.
(TST Gold best second choice)
Dayton 40W Thruster Exciters are suggested for High Frequency Effects.
(There are no really good second choices for this.)

Amps:
For BK/TST - Behringer NXx000D series amps. 1000/3000 with DSP.
----- Each amp will only handle 2 channels.
For Exciters - Behringer EPQ304
----- Each amp will handle 4 channels

Tuning:
There is a lot to get into with this -- but it is important to utilize the DSP to manage frequencies. Read back over suggestions based on implementation of units.


Just trying to create one post with the basis of the concept. I will edit as needed if I am missing part of the flow.
 
Last edited:
So - would you say the following is the key progression for tactile equipment, what I am referring to as "Latte Placement Guidelines"?

A: Pairs of Exciters attached directly to the seat. 2-4 Pairs (4-8 units) wired as sets (no left/right necessary) but each pair should be placed parallel and utilizing a shared channel. Starting at the shoulder, and working your way down to the lower lumbar. (Although, I am not sure why you elected to not go stereo on each of these other than channel limitations?) Placement can be augmented to fit the seat, including wrapping outside of the hips.

B: BK-LFE (Stereo low frequency seat effects). Two units, wired in stereo, and attached as directly to the seat as possible. Isolation of the seat is key.

[From this point - "dual role" can be added to any BK-LFE channel by adding a TST-439 and tuning appropriately.]

C: BK-LFE (MONO low frequency effects for pedals). Unless someone separates and splits their pedal set, no true benefit to stereo - but IS an option.

D: TST-439 (Stereo Mid frequency seat effects). Two units, wired in stereo, and attached as directly to the seat as possible. This is the "dual role" component where you pull the most out of both the BK and the TST working them together on shared effects. Can be a shared channel with each of the BK's or a separate stereo channel utilizing the same effects.

E: BK-LFE (MONO low frequency effects for seat). This creates a third channel for MONO only effects on the seat.



Note:
BK-LFE is suggested for Low Frequency Effects
(Concert best second choice).
TST 439 (Platinum) is suggested for Mid Frequency Effects, PAIRED with a BK-LFE.
(TST Gold best second choice)
Dayton 40W Thruster Exciters are suggested for High Frequency Effects.
(There are no really good second choices for this.)

Amps:
For BK/TST - Behringer NXx000D series amps. 1000/3000 with DSP.
----- Each amp will only handle 2 channels.
For Exciters - Behringer EPQ304
----- Each amp will handle 4 channels

Tuning:
There is a lot to get into with this -- but it is important to utilize the DSP to manage frequencies. Read back over suggestions based on implementation of units.


Just trying to create one post with the basis of the concept. I will edit as needed if I am missing part of the flow.


You need to understand that my own rig build and what it will use is not the same as the recommended concept being offered for people to consider. While both are shared here that may of caused some confusion.

The concept employs some things I discovered from my own testing over a period of two years looking to try different ways to install tactile units. What I learned was that when experimenting with different units and including the exciters. It became very apparent the benefits of having multiple small exciters for the back of a seat brings with effects distribution compared to what typical installations can accomplish with the usual installation methods.

Adding TST units to the "recommended concept", has never been mentioned. Nor that the concept has to operate in a "Dual Role" installation. All that has ever been said was to start with exciters, add more of them and that 6 is the ideal number for the back of a seat.

Three Objectives Of The Concept Are:
  • 1-200Hz Bass Representation
  • Utilization Of Multi Channels & Bodyzones
  • Expandability & Adaptability In How Channels Are Used & Effects Are Incorporated

Six exciters seem the ideal number for the back of a seat, under the knees or pedals are other regions to experiment with. The recommendation for the seat back, is to have units as stereo pairs. Simhub lets us place whatever effects we want to any channels so it does not fix or lock in how channels are used. A user can very easily load a profile that may have a very different placement on what channels certain effects use even if it uses the same or different effects. So one of the benefits is we can easily experiment with how/where we place effects to suit each user own preferences. This alone gives a great deal more options to how/what the user feels to a typical 4 corners+ installation.

So a user may want to experiment or not necessarily have the same effect go to left/right channels. The benefit of having effects placed in stereo pairs over shoulders, sides and lower back lets us place stereo effects on three body regions. It also lets us place any single stereo effect or layer on 6 units over the 3 stereo pairs. So that is a big improvement over what only two single units in the base of a seat can accomplish.

Effect Layers & Numbers
A typical unit will begin to lose definition when you have more than 3-4 effects operating at a time. It depends on the effects and frequencies used but as an approx number, its a general found factor that using fewer effects maintains more detailing of the effects used. As often shared, I can visually see the output with the extra hardware I invested in and use for my own effects development.

As stated before, people have the ability with this concept to now no longer be restricted by this major limiting performance factor. It's a HUGE bonus being able to use multiple channels now, but one that nobody seems to have much interest in lol.

Most tactile users reading this will likely have well over 6 effects or layers, even well over a dozen effect layers operating on a single unit. Common usage will be using multiple layers for a specific effect but also have multiple effects on a single channel.

Multiple Benefits
Clearly the ability to be able to spread effects over 3x pairs of stereo units makes a lot of sense from units operational demands, never mind the additional benefits placing them over the seat to different body zones also has in us feeling them better. We then have to consider the other benefit of what the exciters bring and that is their ability to work with a much wider frequency range.

Its win, win, win for:
"increased channel options", "increased effects distribution" and"increased effects quality".

Large Buttkickers 1,2,3 ?
Having one BK lets you experience the lower bass, having two lets a user experience stereo effects with lower bass. Having more than two then lets the user enjoy other popular mono effects like RPM or SPEED on their own independent channel or channels. The same principle is being applied in that we lower the number of effects layers on each unit or channel and increase the contact area or regions for the extra units to transfer the vibrations into the seat and the user better.


Close It Off
I have already offered and suggested to help someone that is for doing this to start a new or their own thread on this concept. To then use it as a guide and that go into detail of the hardware used and it to cover all the aspects or indeed people's queries.

That never seemed to happen, so my patience and excitement is almost gone in sharing this with others and I am at the point in focusing just on my own build ideas and the effects I have achieved with the concept.

Enough time, already has been consumed continuing to go over and over aspects of the concept or trying to convince people how it totally can transform what we can achieve with tactile or what a typical rig offers to what this can offer. I think its time to let go of it being chatted about in this thread and I will ignore further discussion about it so that this thread can be more about general issues or factors.
 
Last edited:
Ok - I made a quick edit. Not sure where I read not to put them in stereo, it didn't make sense to me lol.

So -- to be clear, all you are suggesting is the exciters.
The rest is bonus.

Speaking of the rest -- does that sound like the most solid approach to a basic build idea? Again -- I am trying to kind of come up with a best practice SOP to refer to when someone asks about tactile. Sure they may use a different unit, but following the concept. It's so obvious that we have moved into a whole new world with Simhub, that I think it makes sense to outline what is now a better and feasible build pattern. Mostly based on your continued testing. (not trying to take credit or anything like that)

As for a build thread -- I myself will probably do one once I get my amp in, and another 209. I know my setup is a whole different beast than yours, so I think it could be useful to share. However, I think I will be in the ball park enough to test some of your effects and give feedback.
 
Now while I have been isolating Mr Latte's feedback --- I have no issues adding other ideas. Motors on pedals, etc. etc. I just would like to eventually have something I can say -- Hey, you're interested, take a look at this and it should give you some ideas on what to build towards for a great experience, etc.
 
People are welcome to do their own threads and I wish more people shared their own creativity, be it with installations effects or general experimentation.

One of the biggest issues with tactile has been making it possible for people to just download a profile that works well for everyone with only minor changes to volume etc. Another large issue is that most people coming into tactile do not quite understand Hz and other factors, they just want nice effects and to get into it with good results with little hassle after the initial installation.

I believe that was possible when people used the "recommend exciters" and these "directly on the seat" and with other additional BK underneath. As stated before it attempted to create a fixed platform for a seat and why the focus was on the seat and not problematic areas like pedals.

It was about reducing the variations different builds have in size materials etc and that's the problem Simvibe always had and never even attempted to offer people well-crafted effects due to so many differing factors.

I have spent almost a year trying to convince people, based on testing that was done what the potential here was, it failed so I am just sick of it all.
 
Well, I am trying to outline your "best of" idea in one concise place so people can reference that and perhaps that could lead to more people installing in a like or at least very similar fashion. Similar enough that it could be treated like a fixed platform. Most people are not going to read through 100+ pages and retain everything, and that is just this particular thread.

That's kind of exactly why I am trying to put your install concept into one place. I am just trying to determine if I have it right or not, instead of being vague - I want it to be clear and concise, no confusion on what the goal is. Ideally, I think a new thread that is dedicated to best practices vs a general discussion. A place where someone can go, see what the goal is - how to get there - and what to do with it. At worst, at least a single post that is cut and dry that showcases what a good goal would be. That's why I am trying to get you to say yay or nay and what changes need to be made to the list if need be.
 
Well, I am trying to outline your "best of" idea in one concise place so people can reference that and perhaps that could lead to more people installing in a like or at least very similar fashion. Similar enough that it could be treated like a fixed platform. Most people are not going to read through 100+ pages and retain everything, and that is just this particular thread.

That's kind of exactly why I am trying to put your install concept into one place. I am just trying to determine if I have it right or not, instead of being vague - I want it to be clear and concise, no confusion on what the goal is. Ideally, I think a new thread that is dedicated to best practices vs a general discussion. A place where someone can go, see what the goal is - how to get there - and what to do with it. At worst, at least a single post that is cut and dry that showcases what a good goal would be. That's why I am trying to get you to say yay or nay and what changes need to be made to the list if need be.

Nice. I can tell you, from a 'new guy', something like that is really really helpful. The first few pages of this thread, with the initial links by Mr.Latte (and others) are absolutely appreciated, and I'm sure took a lot of time and work to build. Is there a positive feedback? Probably not. But they are GOLD.

It is really appreciated all the comments and willingness to share experience and give advice. But they are difficult to find, for someone who is not really patient and willing to spend a lot of time reading. I think 'research', does not have the same meaning it once did.

And yes, I've searched around (also other forums) a *lot*. I think this particular thread probably has the absolute most and best info around, for anyone looking to get into some tactile. There is everything here for the beginner to the mad scientist. So anyone that puts time into organizing, condensing, indexing, all that info......you are maybe an even bigger hero, because it instantly becomes more accessible to the casual 'researcher'. Thank you. The downside..... probably more questions from guys like me.
 
I agree 100% atak_kat. There is more useful info in this thread alone than probably all others combined. I 1000% suggest anyone interested in tactile to read it! (AND TAKE NOTES, you wont remember it all) Lot's of people have added good info that fit's the needs of many. Mr Latte has put more effort (and money) into testing than many of us combined! We've seen him answer the same dozen questions way to many times. I just want to compile the most useful at some point. This is, hopefully, the beginning of that.

Latte's done too much work on this already -- work of passion, for sure -- but it's kind of unfair for him to keep having to re-post the same thing 1000 times. Once we get things detailed, anyone can say hey check out <link to wherever> that breaks it down. Then this thread can live on as a discussion.

But, before I start trying to put together the handbook, I wanted to make sure from Mr Latte, that I have it right. There are three things I am trying to avoid. 1 - obviously WRONG information. 2 - I don't want to add more work on top of the work Latte's done. and 3 -- I don't want anyone thinking I am trying to take credit for their effort.
 
A 112 page thread in a discussion forum is not the way to clearly communicate best practices.. even if the best practices are sprinkled in as a repeat once every few pages. That's not gonna work. That's what blogs, vlogs and wikis are for.

That's not even the real problem here though. This thread is called "Tactile Immersion - General Discussion - Hardware & Software" and the first post includes:

"General banter, or show your rigs, discuss what you have, perhaps what you like or dislike.
Technical queries, issues or offer your own user opinions and experiences. What has excited you or has left you wondering or scratching your head?"


.. and that's exactly how people stumbling in here are using it. If they are like me, they read the first few posts then jump to the last page, then following directions of post 1, start shootin newb bullshit right out of their asses! Trying to make it something else at this point is OF COURSE painful.

I think the recommended method is genius and fascinating, but what it requires for success is a new thread with page 1 post 1 something like:

- do you have a budget of X
- if yes, do you have a fiberglass seat?
- if no, are you willing to buy one?
- if no, read this post and learn, but don't contribute. This thread is not for you. Go to "Tactile Immersion - General Discussion" thread.

Even then, it will become a mess.. that's how forum threads work. They hit a point of critical mass and become a **** show.

On this thread, it will no doubt continue to be the worlds most visited tactile related resource, but the way to create sanity and clarity is:

- build a well organized well written blog or wiki
- respond to 90% of the chaotic posts with relevant links to the blog

Hopefully that will change things so:

1) More efficient education around tactile
2) less burn out and frustration for the person here who is obviously the expert
3) a monetization opportunity for the obvious expert and creator of the blog or wiki
4) people excited about their new tactile experience who jump in and share their total newb thoughts (like I did) won't feel like they are being gently berated for not achieving the impossible task of absorbing all past insights and not magically knowing that how this thread isn't really as free flowing as the first post infers it is ( like I was).
5) people who have been around a while will feel more free to help someone who isn't a candidate for the recommended path without feeling like they are taking a **** in their grandmothers living room. The majority of people who come here are not candidates. They are people at point A interested in getting to point B, and they're typically not working with a blank slate in terms of tactile or rig. They just want to know how to make things better.. which is ALWAYS possible.
6) perhaps most important, and the biggest reason that I decided to write this, people will be less likely to HALF understand the recommended method and end up wasting a bunch of money on gear that is completely unsuitable for the setup that they already have.

If this all comes across as controlling, then.. yeah, I mean I guess it is, but it's coming from a place of trying to fix what is obviously broken and compassion for the frustrations of someone who I have a lot of respect for.
 
Agreed Gnoshme, your blog post was the most helpful thing I'd stumbled upon in regards to 'Tactile' in ages, it was exactly what I was after in terms of my setup, and laid and written up in a clear and easy to read format, rather than trawling through pages of forum posts...
 

Latest News

Do you prefer licensed hardware?

  • Yes for me it is vital

  • Yes, but only if it's a manufacturer I like

  • Yes, but only if the price is right

  • No, a generic wheel is fine

  • No, I would be ok with a replica


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top