Mr Latte
Premium
@Brutal Deluxe
Covered in the thread about 10-12 mths ago I compared these units and at least one more non branded unit from China. For me overall the 40W Thruster was the best unit taking into account its output , easy application and build.
Originally I bought the exciter to compare to my TST units as they were always better for engine RPM or Speed based effects that can use a higher range of bass frequencies. Adding a sense of zing to engine feel, giving more life and felt clarity with the higher RPM range. When you discover what the best low bass feels like and you discover how we can then combine the exciters, then you will realise how limited the Aura Pro and many other budget options are.
While they are nice to get into tactile, sorry to say but in a truthful manner they are budget options and you cannot expect a low price option to offer the best experiences. I have been there too, I know how awesome discovering tactile just working can feel when first discovering it but eventually, you may learn how much you also are missing with the entry-level options.
The benefit of the exciters seemed to be how easily they could be positioned to specific zone on a seat as we cant do this so easily with larger units. Also not everyone wants to drill/bolt multiple holes in what can be expensive seats.
I was quite surprised how well they worked even with the mid 30Hz range and then just started playing with ideas in how we could apply these with multiple channels and specific body regions.
The question I then asked myself is, as Wotever had added the feature I requested to be able to send effects to any channels we wanted with support for multiple soundcards. That opened a whole new path we could never do before and I wondered how would multiple small exciters compare to a single TST unit?
While one technically may be superior the other can be used in multiple sets. With additional channel controls, we can even use delay or ways to have effects seemingly move from one channel to another based on speed or rpm or some value increasing. So there are several benefits we can apply with multiple exciters and not just the benefits they bring to higher frequency detailing but new possibilities with effects creation for the seat.
I mentioned earlier how we cant control how/where the vibrations travel within a seat, but we can determine where vibrations enter the seat with this concept I have been sharing/testing and developing effects for.
To the Next Level
The goal with my own rig is to combine the best low bass, midrange bass detail and also the ability to greatly extend the lightweight but felt harmonics towards the upper limits of bass in the 150Hz -200Hz range. Now my seat alone will use a rather crazy but experimental amount of tactile hardware, with over $6000 worth of gear being used in the seat. That's bonkers, buts it's not what I paid as quite a bit of my stuff was got via ebay and over several years of gathering and experimenting with different models.
Some component examples, excluding interconnects/cabling and other additional hardware:
So from this extreme, I have been working up to the seat having installed. I know how well building on using just the exciters and then adding BK to them etc can work. I have spent over a year looking into and testing possibilities with installations and effects creation.
My advice is to start with a good basis that you can build on with gradually upgrading. Not everyone wants to do what I may prefer, I can only share with people what I have found to be the best approach for increasing the immersion and how to make effects that go beyond the limitations of the normal installation or the typical 4 corners idea that many have used over the years.
Someone else is more than welcome to find and share a better approach or configuration to use. Or they may have done more research/testing or discovered something I haven't. All I can say is I know how good the potential is with this concept/approach compared to other things I have tried in the past.
Covered in the thread about 10-12 mths ago I compared these units and at least one more non branded unit from China. For me overall the 40W Thruster was the best unit taking into account its output , easy application and build.
Originally I bought the exciter to compare to my TST units as they were always better for engine RPM or Speed based effects that can use a higher range of bass frequencies. Adding a sense of zing to engine feel, giving more life and felt clarity with the higher RPM range. When you discover what the best low bass feels like and you discover how we can then combine the exciters, then you will realise how limited the Aura Pro and many other budget options are.
While they are nice to get into tactile, sorry to say but in a truthful manner they are budget options and you cannot expect a low price option to offer the best experiences. I have been there too, I know how awesome discovering tactile just working can feel when first discovering it but eventually, you may learn how much you also are missing with the entry-level options.
The benefit of the exciters seemed to be how easily they could be positioned to specific zone on a seat as we cant do this so easily with larger units. Also not everyone wants to drill/bolt multiple holes in what can be expensive seats.
I was quite surprised how well they worked even with the mid 30Hz range and then just started playing with ideas in how we could apply these with multiple channels and specific body regions.
The question I then asked myself is, as Wotever had added the feature I requested to be able to send effects to any channels we wanted with support for multiple soundcards. That opened a whole new path we could never do before and I wondered how would multiple small exciters compare to a single TST unit?
While one technically may be superior the other can be used in multiple sets. With additional channel controls, we can even use delay or ways to have effects seemingly move from one channel to another based on speed or rpm or some value increasing. So there are several benefits we can apply with multiple exciters and not just the benefits they bring to higher frequency detailing but new possibilities with effects creation for the seat.
I mentioned earlier how we cant control how/where the vibrations travel within a seat, but we can determine where vibrations enter the seat with this concept I have been sharing/testing and developing effects for.
To the Next Level
The goal with my own rig is to combine the best low bass, midrange bass detail and also the ability to greatly extend the lightweight but felt harmonics towards the upper limits of bass in the 150Hz -200Hz range. Now my seat alone will use a rather crazy but experimental amount of tactile hardware, with over $6000 worth of gear being used in the seat. That's bonkers, buts it's not what I paid as quite a bit of my stuff was got via ebay and over several years of gathering and experimenting with different models.
Some component examples, excluding interconnects/cabling and other additional hardware:
So from this extreme, I have been working up to the seat having installed. I know how well building on using just the exciters and then adding BK to them etc can work. I have spent over a year looking into and testing possibilities with installations and effects creation.
My advice is to start with a good basis that you can build on with gradually upgrading. Not everyone wants to do what I may prefer, I can only share with people what I have found to be the best approach for increasing the immersion and how to make effects that go beyond the limitations of the normal installation or the typical 4 corners idea that many have used over the years.
Someone else is more than welcome to find and share a better approach or configuration to use. Or they may have done more research/testing or discovered something I haven't. All I can say is I know how good the potential is with this concept/approach compared to other things I have tried in the past.
Last edited: