Ok will keep an eye out....
Wondered how you put up with the noise lol but yeah I can see all that stuff get a bit warm.....
I was mainly just curious on how you were using the EM with CM channels in what effects you liked or what combination felt good to you. Also how you incorporated the BK Concert. I don't think many people have a great deal of car specific profiles for each sim.
I would appreciate if you did my little frequency test and gave your own scores sometime?
Be nice to get your own comparison of the Concert to the Advance units.
Would you kindly show me the link again to your frequency test so I can do it? thanksOk will keep an eye out....
Wondered how you put up with the noise lol but yeah I can see all that stuff get a bit warm.....
I was mainly just curious on how you were using the EM with CM channels in what effects you liked or what combination felt good to you. Also how you incorporated the BK Concert. I don't think many people have a great deal of car specific profiles for each sim.
I would appreciate if you did my little frequency test and gave your own scores sometime?
Be nice to get your own comparison of the Concert to the Advance units.
Would you kindly show me the link again to your frequency test so I can do it? thanks
that would be great.Cheers Dennis, will read over and digest but would be excellent to maybe get a chat with you sometime via Skype etc. If you want by all means PM.
@Mr Latte Just a quick question why, and how would you use a crossover. I have them built into the two cheap Le Pye amps I am using at the moment (until I get an upgrade here ) the output for them is left right and a sub. FYI I also have a standalone crossover switch (not in use at the moment)
I will post some photos of my setup later! Please don't laugh, its a desk and office chair setup.
Dennis I looked at some of the "Tones" your using for effects and not sure if it is the overrated "Auto Tune Intelligent Peaks" feature that is adapting previous manual settings. Yet from what I see or personally found is, that you have scope for much better use of frequencies.
If you want give me an hour or so of your time and let's see what we can do, with a new profile.
Then you can compare it to what you already have but really it's upto you friend.
It must have taken you a while to type all that out! LOL Anyway thanks for that. I will have to do some testing. If I use the crossover on the Amps I will only get the Sub channel whereas if I put my spare separate crossover I can put it on the 2 Channels from one amp, well at least test it. Mind you the Sub channel puts out a bit more power than the L/R channels. But from my readings of your posts I understand maybe my setup the CM might not be the best and would be better off on the EM. Then again I need to look into SSW !A common mistake with some of these cheap 2.1 amps inc crossovers is that unlike a speaker capable of producing full range audio they will use in conjunction these amps with basic/cheap tactile transducers. These amps are primarily to allow a sub to get a bass output to accompany small speakers.
Some of the £/$ 50 or less tactile transducer units by their specifications are often restricted to very limited frequency ranges. I have had reports that some may only offer a tactile response only with @ 40-80Hz and then do so with limited energy also. You can see this from one of the current ongoing threads with a user, new to tactile, on a budget and having purchased a $30 Dayton BST 1 transducer.
So with a source like "Audio Tactile" using full range of frequencies and levels of harmonics these units may produce limited actual vibration but can be quite audible like a speaker but sound a tad tinny and annoying.
The purpose of the crossover is to determine what frequencies the tactile will operate with.
In this example if, a user was using "Audio Tactile" as the source but restricted the crossover to a "Low Pass" max of 100Hz then any frequencies over 100Hz are not used. In this case it would remove much of the audible noise they may generate but let them still perform in producing tactile within their specifications. This is also the intention with speakers, where a small unit may not produce bass frequencies below eg: 60Hz but an accompanying subwoofer would. Therefore the crossover filters all frequencies from the input source to the setting eg: 60Hz the crossover is set for frequencies below this to go to the subwoofer output.
Tactile Transducer Perspective:
Really for bass/energy, you can feel as reported many times anything in around or above 100Hz is more akin to a mobile phone vibration. It will offer minor tingle or detailing.
Simvibe while it can produce some effects upto @300Hz these are generally harmonics of much lower fundamental frequencies. Harmonics occur naturally and go into the KHz levels but really most people will use Simvibe "tone generated" effects with frequencies below 100Hz for tactile transducers to represent effects or felt sensations. You can test this with test-tone generators but will find the "tones" become more audible than felt.
I had planned a thread sometime on more detail on frequencies and things like crossovers but already I feel on this topic I post too much and too often as little others get engaged with it. As already can be seen in various threads.
Hope its some help though...
It must have taken you a while to type all that out! LOL Anyway thanks for that. I will have to do some testing. If I use the crossover on the Amps I will only get the Sub channel whereas if I put my spare separate crossover I can put it on the 2 Channels from one amp, well at least test it. Mind you the Sub channel puts out a bit more power than the L/R channels. But from my readings of your posts I understand maybe my setup the CM might not be the best and would be better off on the EM. Then again I need to look into SSW !
I see!! When I get home tonight I will take some photos and list my equipment.Can do shorter posts (honest) for example:
I can't say exactly until you share what you are using or how you want to configure your tactile installation/configuration.
Thanks for sharing, so we see you like to add a spot of d.i.y and creativity with some "tinkering". Excellent, no harm in showing what you have but it would be good to get from you your own experiences and highlight what you feel you are lacking or perhaps restricted with the tactile you have. I would look forward to your tests on frequencies with these units you have.
Then discuss how or in which way to gradually move forward if desired.
What I would expect you to find, is what is common with @ 40-80Hz, being quite good and they may be best @ 40-60Hz where the majority of their own energy output is found.
Same But Different?
Another factor is that two fairly affordable units outputting a frequency range of say eg: 40-80Hz (assuming within their operating specs). Running both at similar volumes on the same amplifiers, will not necessarily output the same level of energy being felt with these same frequencies. Both are producing similar frequencies but what matters is also how well they can deliver them.
I Have the POWER!!!
This is not just a wattage thing neither. People seem almost obsessed with wattage ratings as the standard to determine potential performance. Each transducer model/design will have its own maximum potential in the energy it can deliver with various frequencies. A Buttkicker generally delivers more energy due to their piston based design. Yet they require a minimum and generally more wattage to move the piston. When it comes to low frequencies and even those below 50Hz then also the quality of bass/energy an amplifier can deliver with these frequencies is also very relevant. Many cheap amps do not need to deliver good energy here as they are generally designed to work with cheap speakers that won't really deliver much response below this 50Hz bass range. So for tactile, that does require such then it is an important factor to have an amp that can deliver low frequencies and with adequate clout. This is one reason why amps designed in mind to power large drivers or woofers are a good match for tactile as they are designed to constantly output strong energy with frequencies below 40,30,20,10 Hz. Stereo amps, particularly cheap ones are not designed necessarily for this role or are well matched for a quality tactile experience.
Familiar Picture But Listen?
We could take speakers or headphones as an example. 5 different models, each could all be playing the same music, from the same source, at the same/similar wattage output, yet some will deliver more bass and energy with the mid-low frequencies than others. This due to the components used and design more focused on delivering better performance. Yet all the models will likely claim in specs similar frequency responses. The same could be said with different amplifiers used on these speakers/headphones, as certain amps may deliver certain frequencies with more amplitude/energy be it hard hitting punchy bass or providing warmth and smoothness to the sound palette than others. This is often then, why in hifi you can find people that match particular products together, as some compound on their individual strengths or characteristics.
Going back to tactile....
Good amp that can deliver low bass is relevant. How relevant depends on the quality of the tactile being used. A good tactile unit being used on a weedy bass cheapo amp will be wasted/limited. A performance limited tactile unit with a good amp will still just perform at its own potential best. A good amp and good tactile unit will produce excellent results.
Listed Specs Vs Real World Performance:
I see some models for example, several cheap Rockwood transducers from Sintron (found on Amazon) that may list specs like 20Hz-55Hz. This is very narrow and limited frequency range. Even then I welcome anyone to try test-tones on these with 20-30Hz and at their max potential volume to clarify just how underwhelming they will likely feel with these rather low frequencies yet are within their listed specs.
Discern for a moment this chart and compare the size of the grids for different frequencies.
See the size scale that covers from 5 - 30Hz compared to 30Hz and beyond. If I am correct in my understanding the bandwidth/energy found in 5-30Hz (25Hz range) is equivalent to that found 30-approx 140Hz (110Hz range) or more.
Lower frequencies by their nature, always require much more energy and are therefore harder for a unit to deliver with sufficient energy.
Simvibe Limitations To Expect:
For Simvibe as example how does a user go about using a range of various effects, to then have these effects all feel different/unique when the units they own may have a very narrow frequency range in which they actually do feel much or any good with. Even the most common 40-80Hz (feel good range) is rather limited to try and cram several effects into. This is one reason why some people will say "fewer effects used" is giving more (in immersion) than having lots of effects operating at once. As what happens is the usage of multiple effects using similar frequencies can boost the amplitude of these frequencies to a point of clipping or that the unit used is then overwhelmed or not delivering its potential or best-composed detail.
Basically if buying cheap then expect to have more limitations, not just in the Hz available that will feel good but also how many or what effects can be used and these effects not all feel like the same. People tend to use similar frequencies, as they revert to the ones that feel good/better on their tactile when perhaps individually testing/configuring effects. Yet with Simvibe, one key is determining which effects or how to prioritise, which effects should get priority over the best Hz each user's actual tactile units can deliver. That's another discussion perhaps for another time.