RCHeliguy
Premium
What are these new fangled thingamabobs ?I thought VR users these days are a quite smart niche.
Woah!!! Boobies!
Last edited:
What are these new fangled thingamabobs ?I thought VR users these days are a quite smart niche.
You shouldn't believe everything people claim on the internet. My 8KX with DMAS has a little delay, but it's rather in the 20-30 ms range and can be fixed by just mirroring the main audio-output to the headset in SteamVR. Humans are noticing audio-latency more than visual latency btw. and in audio-production you need to get under 8 ms to play in sync with your instrument-monitor.Do you hold Pimax to this standard for not publishing that their DMAS audio solution has a half second of latency? Or is their moving target approach of shipping an unfinished product a catch all for everything wrong with the headset?
He said, the displays of the Crystal are "far better" and sounds more like an obvious fact than his opinion. IMO a comparison with a Pico 4 or Quest Pro would be interesting at this point, but seems all previewers of the BSB avoid this subject successfully so far and who wants to run just 75 Hz? Major deal breaker if it can't exceed 1920 x 1920 pixels per eye on 90 Hz natively.My take aways. He still prefers the Crystal's display.
He is getting used to the BSB custom interface and now says he can very comfortably use it for many hours.
He didn't like the Quest at 72Hz or the G2 at 60Hz, but really likes the BSB at 75Hz and he is getting a very solid 75Hz with it which is a frame rate that is difficult to reach in MSFS with the Aero or Crystal.
Company cultures change, but (like people) not always usefullywon't be hard for the BSB to have a better release than the cluster F#$@ that was the Crystal release.