oh wow! a track with trees and other landmarks, elevation changes, and without torturous hairpins, how can i pass this up. i'm in!
It's one of if not the best track in the game. IMO!
oh wow! a track with trees and other landmarks, elevation changes, and without torturous hairpins, how can i pass this up. i'm in!
You’re right. It’s actually the first track I raced with your group. We were driving the RSS GT cars that time. It was a blast.It's one of if not the best track in the game. IMO!
You’re right. It’s actually the first track I raced with your group. We were driving the RSS GT cars that time. It was a blast.
Road Atlanta and Watkins Glen are right up there for me too.
Ok, if that's the case I'll take the Bavarian again.BOP has reset
Oh no....you mean I've got competition for being a troublemaker?? That's ok, it's good to have strength in numbers Grumpy Old Men Rule!!!!!!!!Yessup, sounds good.
Won't even complain about car, track or BOP
(And thats a first )
I mean message me the passwordI would like to practice on this server. Could you add me?
Bayro been replaced by Bayer. Update first post?
I would like to practice on this server. Could you add me?
Ok, I hate to bring back up the BOP topic. But I can't help thinking about the dialog that Erie had with his wife. And I have the same sentiment as Carsten, that she is right (of course wives are always right)!
The problem I have is kind of what she said, but in a slightly different way. That is, we in the back have no influence on the BOP change. If we think of why BOP came to life, it was to even out the field in a multi-manufacture competition, sort of a cost cap. But that is not the reason we are using BOP. We are trying to prevent the three car race series turned into a single car one. For this case, why don't we apply the penalty (or caret) more directly to the objective?
What if we try this algorithm after each race (for an example race of 5 Mercs, 3 Beemers, and 2 Lanzos, all started with zero BOP ):
Above will drive towards equal number of each cars in our races. And everyone has an input to the outcome. Just a thought
- Add 1kg or 1% restrictor to the car with most entry for each number of cars it has over the second most popular car (Merc gets 1kg * (5 - 3) = 2kg or 1kg + 1%);
- No change to the car in the middle (Beemer stays at 0 BOP);
- Reduce 1kg or 1% restrictor to the car with least entry for each number of cars it has deficit over the second most popular car (Lanzo gets reduced by 1kg * (3 - 2) = 1kg, since it has none, Merc and Beemer each gets added that amount, so we end up with: Merc 2kg+1%, Beemer 1kg+1%, Lanzo 0)
Darn, I should be practicing at Rd Am instead of type on the forum! That sure looks like a fun track to drive! Off to my Beemer, ah, Bayer what ever its BOP
Are they being made by RSS? Aldi haha, that's the name of a cheap supermarket over here. There are often jokes that when quality isn't good it's from the AldiRumour has it the the mclando 720s and aldi r8 are in the works, so this will be an ongoing process. Hopefully they will continue to be in range of each other that the small <15kg <15% restrictor does the job. The GT1s were a bit too stretched even before you consider the viper.
I know you don't want this point supported.... But I just did a few laps in the merc BOP free and down the straights I noticed maybe .05-.07s difference in my delta? For me, like when deciding how much fuel to add, I definitely lose more time due to driver error over a race than any small weight difference. And not seeing the delta shoot up down the straights at Road America without BOP anecdotally "confirms" thatOn the other hand I think the impact is rather more psychological as a perceived injustice than a measurable performance handycap.