but was it really something completely unacceptable, or more like prejudice and your unwillingness to work around some issues
The crux of this is that personal priorities are very subjective.
We have very different priorities. Back when I had a Rift CV1 and you had a Samsung Odyssey I felt I had good reasons to stick with the CV1. I can list my reasons why it was a good for for me at the time and you can list the reasons why it was not a good fit for you.
I can respect that difference of opinion and priorities.
Years ago when I decided the Index was what I wanted, you had a very strong anti-lighthouse tracking sentiment and considered it obsolete on arrival because of the resolution.
Once again that is perfectly fine and I can respect that we had different priorities.
The fact is that today I would still pick the CV1 over the Odyssey and I would still have purchased the Index when I did.
This is the same situation.
We have a different list of what we consider inconveniences and deal breakers.
Obviously I'm more willing to work around issues on a headset that I consider inconveniences than I am one that I consider having deal breakers. These are my dealbreakers not yours.
I agree that the G2 is one hell of a bang for the buck headset, and I continue to believe that if you can make that headset work for you, than do it.
On top of that we are in complete agreement that the Aero is not a financially responsible purchase especially for an interim solution. I'm not trying to tell everyone to go out and buy an Aero.