RCHeliguy
Premium
Not sure where to put this, but This guy is running 15 feet of cooling hose to a radiator in another room and he did mention considering putting it outside when he can.
In the cooler months, you could just hang a coil of tubing in a box out a window.That is funny....in a funny type of way.
That radiator won't have anything to do by the time the coolant reaches it.
He'd need a CPU capable of Chernobyl type temps.
The movement and volume of that much coolant in the lines will remove all heat.
...instead of a PCI-e card edge connector, they should integrate an ITX board.if that size is real
Oh no...They also said, "ahem" that it would be even more expensive...
He's not a sim-racer and deep blacks, small form factor and lighthouse-tracking are great features for roomscale-VR, but not that important in sim-racing unlike the hFOV. Headsets like the Pico 4 or Quest Pro should be avoided because of missing displayport. From trying out my Pico 4 with VD and cable I know that it's fine for playing HL:Alyx wireless, but the latency more than doubles if launching sim-racing titles north of 40 milliseconds including the sound. Also the procedure to launch the Pico OS, choose the boundaries and connect to the PC (controllers required) is not acceptable to me.He starts out saying how on paper this headset makes no sense, but that the experience is somehow much better.
He does mention that with higher resolution he's starting to consider eye tracking a requirement, but he's giving these a pass. In fact he mentions a number of things that he's giving this a pass on and suggests that he probably won't be using this headset for a very long time.
This review explains that the Quest Pro doesn't have the glare of the BSB, and the Quest Pro edge to edge sharpness is better. The BSB requires prescription lenses if you are a glasses wearer and it another source of fogging.
It just smells funny.I think after 191 pages, we can clearly establish VR is NOT dead.
...Headsets like the Pico 4 or Quest Pro should be avoided because of missing displayport. ...
The Pico 4 and Quest Pro doesn't have HDMI either and seems that DP has replaced this display-connection these days. In theory the USB could do the trick like the PSVR2 does, but that doesn't work with normal USB 3 ports. The image needs to be coded into H.264 or whatever and encoded on the headset, which takes about 25 ms alone and it's basically like using some old 60 Hz TV for sim-racing with huge input-lag plus more load on the PC similar to streaming content to YouTube.So, what's the issue with hdmi instead of DP?
No issues if it's modern HDMI 2.1. But if it's an older 2.0 version then it supports only 14.4Gb/s bandwidth, while DP 1.4 has 25.92So, what's the issue with hdmi instead of DP?