Trust me, as a Norwegian, I can remember the 2003 season pretty well!
But after 2004 it wasn't that though opposition anymore. The Subaru started it's way down. Ford had Gardemeister and Kresta (Even though Gardemeister is a quick driver, he is not a Loeb, Makinen, McRae, Sainz or anything like it). Peugeot had it's... "good" 307. Sainz had reitred, and well, Mitsubishi couldn't regain it's late 90's speed, and Skoda, was Skoda, a pretty good car, but slow drivers. In 2006, Grönholm was in Ford, but that was the only real threat that Loeb had, Subaru was steadily going down. And Manfred Stohl ended 4th total in a privateer Peugeot 307. That's not really something that proves good quality, not that Stohl is slow, but, again, he's not a top-driver. After 2006 we've had Ford vs Citroën, where Citroën has used a lot more money each year.
And the rallies are quite similar. Friday is 3-4 stages run twice, same is saturday, and sunday is a bit shorter. Every rally is almost like a sprint-rally.
Go 15 years back in time -> The rallies was different from eachother. You had Toyota, Mitsubishi, Subaru and Ford (and later Peugeot instead of Toyota) that had good cars. Drivers like Makinen, Burns, Kankkunen, McRae, Sainz, Delecour, Auriol, Grönholm, you had more drivers and teams that could fight for championships and victories. And different drivers, cars, tyres suited different rallies. A good example of this is the Safari rally.
But again, as we've seen, Loebs teammate haven't been second in the championship too often. So of course he is a bloody fast driver. But rally isn't what it was.