More often than not in rallying you lose rather than win. For example this year Hirvonen lost the championship, more so than Loeb won it if you get what I mean. The 2006 season similar. Loeb had the last 4 off because of his mountain biking accident. Gronholm should have taken the title. But he didn't and lost out by one point. Then again Loeb is one of a few drivers who can truly win, in the sense that he is the fastest and nobody else can touch him and he doesn't win because of someone else's misfortune. Was it Italy this year where he won running first on the road? That was pure skill. But of course part of rallying is staying on the road so winners won't always win, losers just crash. I do think the calibre of competition has dropped in the last few years. In any given season now there only four drivers winning rallies as opposed to ten or so years ago when there were 6 or 7. Part of this I think is lack manufacturer entries and backing/financial support. Also teams used to run as many as four cars, now only two.
Loeb can be beaten. I don't want to see him retire, because then we'll never know if he actually can be. It looks now as if Jari Matti is the one to do it. But that is in Fords hands now. Also if Petter gets a factory seat he could win a rally for the first time since 2005 which would be cool. Running his own team has clearly impacted his performance because there were times this year where he had speed. I think up until mid season he had the most stage wins for 2011.