I have to disagree with this one.... He is certainly right up there, but the era that he drove in is so much more a result of the $'s and the tech that some teams bring to the table, but Senna?, Fangio?,Stewart?, I don't think so.
Cheers
There's some truth to your assertion, absolutely, which is why I believe Ferrari must hire some better team principals. However, I think that Vettel is prone to make more mistakes than Hamilton and he doesn't seem to be able to know when to attack and when to wait. I wonder if the pressure of being the Ferrari team leader is not a bit too much to bear?
that's fair enough, if Schumacher didn't drive for Ferrari in those years, he would probably have less titles as well,
I suppose to a degree, it's also a team + pilot combination, just becasue Hamilton and Mercedes worked great, it doesn't mean that Mercedes + Vettel would have worked the same, but also the other way, Hamilton could struggle in Ferrari , ... it's just that sometimes the combination is unbeatable , like it was Schumi in Ferrari and is now Hamilton in Mercedes
And when Daemon Hill won his, was it the skill ?So when Hamilton won his first championship title, it wasn't because of his skill?
Wouldn't have mattered either way I guess since he is the best driver in on the grid.Well, during his career he was always in a car equal or better than Ferrari, so that's why no need.
People are allowed their opinions, hence why I gave mine. If you don't like then please refrain from commenting.
Thank you.