It is the sheer inconsistent decisions of the stewards. That is the whole point.
They were not inconsistent at all. In fact, this was the ONLY race in 30 years where they got everything right on track limits...from P1 to Race Finsih. You have to step back a second to realize why we are here in the first place. We are here because F1 forced track owners and designers (with money) to design track for their cars. At the same time, draconian (or "entirely reasonable" depending on your age) safety measures were forced on track owners in order to stay in F1. This led to desgns like COTA, which is virtually impossible to find in a series outside of F1 and also impossible to police. The FIA found this out the hard way in Hungary 2016. That was possibly worst stewarding I have ever seen in any race. After the debacle that was Hungary (even if you just look at *one* of the bad judgments for that weekend - tack limits - it's a complete failure), the FIA probably said "we can't let that happen again." So, we saw Red Bull later that year. Personally, I liked that approach best -- you have two choices driver...stay on the black or destroy your car. Some chose to destroy their car. Fair enough. But nobody went wide.
COTA is a track that never would have been designed but for F1 controlling every step of new track development, and arguing for 14.4 miles of pavement runoffs because of "safety concerns" -- the last refuge of scoundrels. Combine that with a bunch of non-racing pretty boys that watch every weekend and you have a "racing equals soccer" mentality. Only it doesn't. Watch any series, any track, any driver, any weekend, and you will find many many "cuts" that were unintentional and didn't gain an advantage. What people most often forget is this -- if everyone including the FIA, drivers, Charlie Whiting, and God himself (Ted at Sky) know and agree that turns 9 and 20 are designed in a way as to naturally allow a car to run wide in 2017 (not 2016) then that's what we are going to do. We aren't going to ever again get into a situation where we hand out Codemasters-like warnings then time penalties, or do like Hungary and *say* you get 10 (whatever) warnings and then completely ignore our own rule at the end of the race (looking at you Max) when it matters most.
What most modern day F1 fans don't get is that F1 is not the norm in racing. It's the exception. And so, they can either argue that they are so different and special that they need their own special "racing rules" to police drivers like a video game or play by the same rules that have been with us since Indianapolis and Rouen. However, my point is simple -- they are all professionals. They are all well paid. They all (as Sky announced even) knew the limits and they all agreed to break them in places, which they all did. Nobody can "gain an advantage" (the second part of the rule that most forget) if everyone agrees that either certain corners were okay to run wide (COTA 2017) or the track limit is defined as "whatever you can get away with" (IndyCar 2017, Watkins Glen), so the result is still the same when...
A driver that decides to overtake for 3rd, another driver (former World Champion, who clearly could have taken the same liberties himself) on the last lap, with the world watching, and then tries to blame the illegal move on the very liberties that the FIA and other drivers all agreed would be allowed.
Are people starting to understand why the rest of the paddock hates this guy? He's not bold. He's not fast. He's not aggressive. He's dangerous and stupidly arrogant. And now, he's making the FIA look bad, which I'm all for, and should be done regularly, but not in this case.
We will never hear, from Max, the kind of response that KMag gave when asked about his blocking during qualifying, where he admitted his error, and blamed himself, despite his team telling him Perez was on an out lap. Max is one giant distraction from the real shock talent -- Carlos Sainz. If F1 operated on the basis of statistics and logic instead of money and popularity, Carlos would be in the Red Bull seat instead of Max.
The reason Kimi didn't notice or care about Max's move is the very reason people love him -- he could care less about rules, and would prefer that it was a massive fist fight, in which case Mr. Verstappen would be in big trouble. Kimi sees this stuff as drivel, which it is. I'm sure his default position is like the rest of the racing community -- what track limits? It's only a limit of I get caught. lol.