RD Formula Manager - Season 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lap 1:
Ricciardo: easy and medium revs
Vettel: safe and medium revs
Raikkonen: safe and medium revs
Kubica: safe, medium revs, use ERS and pit in. Wet tyres and 42lit fuel.

Lap 2:
Ricciardo: focus, low revs, use ERS and pit in. Wet tyres and 64lit fuel.
Vettel: safe and medium revs
Raikkonen: safe and medium revs
Kubica: safe and medium revs
 
  • Deleted member 161052

Lap 1
All 4 pit for wets, max fuel and repair car damage
Both Canons easy medium
Both Nitros safe medium

Lap 2
All 4 safe medium, don't fight eachother

Edit: full wets not hards, my mistake
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1st lap
PET play safe, safe low to the pits, wets, 38l
BEL easy low

ALO easy low
CLA play safe, safe low to the pits, wets, 48l

2nd lap
PET easy low
BEL easy low

ALO easy low
CLA easy low

All 4 don't fight each other, if one's faster than the other let him pass.
 
I editted my orders, but I'll repost here just in case.
Ram F1
Both Drivers, Both Laps
Easy and Low
Edit:
Both pit Lap One for Wet tyres only
 
upload_2016-6-1_0-46-25.png


upload_2016-6-1_0-59-11.png
 
I forgot to tell Ferenc to go back to easy! good thing he didn't crash out :unsure:

Lap1:
Fangio safe high, pit 42l wets
Ferenc safe medium

Lap2
Fangio safe low
Ferenc pit, 42l wets; safe low

use ERS both laps, don't fight each other
 
Last edited:
  • Deleted member 161052

Lap 1
All 4 easy medium

Lap 2
All 4 safe medium
 
@Omer Said: Peterson had a +4 gap to Szisz before they stopped, now it's 0.3, with pitskill 4-1 for Pet. Gap to Fangio was ~10. How is that even possible, you can't tell me that's down to tyres only?

Taking BEL as reference, PET had -2.25 on him before the stop, CLA was 11.59 behind. After stops it's 7.6 for PET and 19.53 for CLA.
Time lost for PET: 9.85
Time lost for CLA: 7.94
Both fine laps, same pace. Massive skill and chassis advantage for PET. Normal stop time for him was around 4.5, so with wrong tyre I'd expected a time loss of ~5.5 max.
 
Last edited:
Lap 1:
Ricciardo: safe and medium revs
Vettel: safe, medium revs, use ERS, play safe and pit in. Wet tyres and 60lit fuel.
Raikkonen: push and high revs. Icecream is ready in the pit :(
Kubica: safe and low revs

Lap 2:
Ricciardo: safe and medium revs
Vettel: safe and medium revs
Kubica: safe and low revs
 
@Omer Said: Peterson had a +4 gap to Szisz before they stopped, now it's 0.3, with pitskill 4-1 for Pet. Gap to Fangio was ~10. How is that even possible, you can't tell me that's down to tyres only?

Taking BEL as reference, PET had -2.25 on him before the stop, CLA was 11.59 behind. After stops it's 7.6 for PET and 19.53 for CLA.
Time lost for PET: 9.85
Time lost for CLA: 7.94
Both fine laps, same pace. Massive skill and chassis advantage for PET.
Could it just be a RNG that the pit crew made a mistake?
 
@Omer Said: Peterson had a +4 gap to Szisz before they stopped, now it's 0.3, with pitskill 4-1 for Pet. Gap to Fangio was ~10. How is that even possible, you can't tell me that's down to tyres only?

Taking BEL as reference, PET had -2.25 on him before the stop, CLA was 11.59 behind. After stops it's 7.6 for PET and 19.53 for CLA.
Time lost for PET: 9.85
Time lost for CLA: 7.94
Both fine laps, same pace. Massive skill and chassis advantage for PET. Normal stop time for him was around 4.5, so with wrong tyre I'd expected a time loss of ~5.5 max.

Gap to Fangio was around 8 actually. The dry tyres absolutely go terrible especially past 50-60 wetness levels. Inters are optimum around those values which was used by Szisz. Wets are also good to go as we saw Fangio's massive advantage. Expecting a 5.5 loss is a bit optimistic under these conditions. Furthermore, there is pitstop randomization as well. However, it is curious to see the difference of lost time between Clark and Peterson. I tried to figure out the problem, but could not spot any. A bad pitstop should affect around 1-1,5 maximum.

One possible explanation might be that Bellof caught him before the stops and overtaking randomization decreased their speeds. But the system did not give an "Overtook" or "Blocked" message. Really not sure. Excel's randomization system went nuts for a moment? Very low possibility, but might happen. I am sorry if there is a mistake, but i updated the game as usual as i have always did. :unsure:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest News

Do you prefer licensed hardware?

  • Yes for me it is vital

  • Yes, but only if it's a manufacturer I like

  • Yes, but only if the price is right

  • No, a generic wheel is fine

  • No, I would be ok with a replica


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top