iRacing.com Motorsport Simulations

Status
Not open for further replies.
I run a 24 inch monitor in the middle with a 19 inch either side using softth. Hope to get another 2 24s in the future.

How is the performance? I'm worried about Soft TH sucking up CPU. But as the middle screen is probably rendered directly by the GFX card (is it?) and the side screens are just for looking left and right, I guess some delay left and right is ok.

Are you running full resolution left and right? Are the screens the same height as your 24" or how did you adjust the size difference?

I'm running a 27" screen as my single one at the moment and I can imagine buying cheap 5:4 19" screens for left and right, together with a new ATI 5850 or 5870.
 
I wonder if they were listening to the real world pro drivers when they planned fasttrack. I mean, if I were a pro driver, I wouldn't want to wait for like more than a year before I can race my series.

We'll have to see how it works out. I really hope that you really have to be good to be promoted to C, B and A class.

I was lucky somehow and got my D license in about a week, enabling me to race C races shortly after I started iRacing (after getting the D 4.0 rating). And it was too soon. From that experience, I guess that fasttrack will be toned down soon, because with fasttrack, people with too little experience are enabled to join higher classes.
 
From what I've heard on iRacing forum, Willem, Indy Lights is gonna be C 4.0+ and IndyCar is gonna be B 4.0+. But since now we're gonna have the fast track thing, they're gonna be B and A classes respectively. :wink2:


EDIT:
the 2009 season schedule is out... No Indy Lights yet, only IndyCar! That means only A license...
 
It works well considering.

Im running at a res of 4120x1024 with frame rates around 70 fps it drops a bit in heavy traffic but never below 40 fps. I have also turned down the detail in iracing to low and medium with no shadows. There is a performance hit using softth but the view you get for me makes the reduction in eye candy well worth it. To be honest I dont notice the difference when concentrating on keeping on the black stuff.

The res on the sides is set to 1024x768 just now I think but you dont really notice the difference.

This is with an 8800GTX as the main card doing all the processing and 9XXX series card outputing to the sides.

With the ATI 58XX all screens would need to be the same resolution I dont think it wiill do mixed res in a display group.

Ricky
 
I wish I only had a 19" screen at the moment... I really have to run the 27" at the native resolution or I can see every single pixel.

Maybe I'll just replace it... The comment "I'd go for option 2 everytime" (meaning he prefers 3x 22" screens) below sounds reasonable. And if I spend > 1500 for new hardware, I don't want to tune to gfx quality down.
 
  • diabolesco

my opinion based on my personal experience

I have played in 1 and 2 cases, things like 3d vision, I am sure that you can't play more than 2 hour without headache... (this is I supose...)

My brother has a 37" and playing in his computer is ABSOLUTELY AMAZING....

but....

My setup is an intel 2.6 with 8800GTX (main card) and a 8400GS (second card, only for image spam thorught monitors) 2x17" and 1x20".... using softth software (it permits DIFFERENT resolutions, matrox th2go only you can same resolution).... with my computer I get on GTR 60 to 90 frames at 1680x1050 and 2x1024x768,,, you can see you have more machine than me.... all details MAX,... , but for the sides, needs to be 16bit and no AA at all for get the high rates)

I think two cases are gorgeous.... but I think I prefer triple wide gaming..... you get the panoramic vision.... and I think this is great...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest News

Do you prefer licensed hardware?

  • Yes for me it is vital

  • Yes, but only if it's a manufacturer I like

  • Yes, but only if the price is right

  • No, a generic wheel is fine

  • No, I would be ok with a replica


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top