Why is there no "yawm" button?
Cause they didn't make one
Why is there no "yawm" button?
That's not funnyWhy is there no "yawm" button?
*yawn*That's not funny
What was all that in the HoF and Discussion Thread about not allowing posts in the FG section to count? Damn I wonder why reading all that crap. Grow up.
Well natural progression of tabs in an mobile phone internet browser is why.Damn I wonder why you decided to reply here, rather than there. Maybe I should reply to FFG?
You don't seem to understand my point. The very first post was there just to stop the flooding in the threads here. There was almost one page in most threads about the ratings. But what really made me say that was the small argument between Rami and Tim, that would end as a big argument most likely. The post count I mentioned for the second bit, which was the bit I didn't expect anyone to do in the first place, which is reply to the thread where there was the announcement for post ratings disabled.
I said my opinion once in there, and while I didn't get a reply, I wasn't expecting a reply from previous experience with these changes and my opinions.
Oh and speaking of post count, if you didn't notice I was happy when it was removed for this section, as I was looking at my post count at the time trying to minimise it, this change made my job easier. Why I mentioned it was not standalone, and the things about mr. spamalot etc. were just for banter.
oh, and if your next reply is not in PM, my next reply will be in FFG.
Euhm I was the one who wanted to stop the discussion, remember. I believe I said something like "This discussion stops now"Damn I wonder why you decided to reply here, rather than there. Maybe I should reply to FFG?
You don't seem to understand my point. The very first post was there just to stop the flooding in the threads here. There was almost one page in most threads about the ratings. But what really made me say that was the small argument between Rami and Tim, that would end as a big argument most likely. The post count I mentioned for the second bit, which was the bit I didn't expect anyone to do in the first place, which is reply to the thread where there was the announcement for post ratings disabled.
I said my opinion once in there, and while I didn't get a reply, I wasn't expecting a reply from previous experience with these changes and my opinions.
Oh and speaking of post count, if you didn't notice I was happy when it was removed for this section, as I was looking at my post count at the time trying to minimise it, this change made my job easier. Why I mentioned it was not standalone, and the things about mr. spamalot etc. were just for banter.
oh, and if your next reply is not in PM, my next reply will be in FFG.
yes but it still didn't stop itEuhm I was the one who wanted to stop the discussion, remember. I believe I said something like "This discussion stops now"
I assume you are saving now?At least I was in pole... Sigh another average race weekend
Hmmmm, the guys who didn't listen to it, maybe have to have a deep thoughtyes but it still didn't stop it
Damn I wonder why you decided to reply here, rather than there. Maybe I should reply to FFG?
You don't seem to understand my point. The very first post was there just to stop the flooding in the threads here. There was almost one page in most threads about the ratings. But what really made me say that was the small argument between Rami and Tim, that would end as a big argument most likely. The post count I mentioned for the second bit, which was the bit I didn't expect anyone to do in the first place, which is reply to the thread where there was the announcement for post ratings disabled.
I said my opinion once in there, and while I didn't get a reply, I wasn't expecting a reply from previous experience with these changes and my opinions.
Oh and speaking of post count, if you didn't notice I was happy when it was removed for this section, as I was looking at my post count at the time trying to minimise it, this change made my job easier. Why I mentioned it was not standalone, and the things about mr. spamalot etc. were just for banter.
oh, and if your next reply is not in PM, my next reply will be in FFG.
loland also you cannot talk about arguments in this thread
which as much as it was accidental , it was following the game rules. Plus to add, the majority still agreed with my decision.e) In the event of the occurrence of a game breaking bug - i.e. pitstop bug, drivers running out of fuel - the race results will be taken from an appropriate time, usually one sector prior to the bugs appearance. However if less then 75% race distance has been completed the results will be declared null and void.
No, I was not talking about that race, unfortunately for you, now that point is invalid. Point is, instead of calming the situation, you heat it further, and you also enjoy it, but when it comes to bite you, you start getting stroppy (so much for wanting no arguments). [/SPOILER]lol
apparently the game moderator has no right to react to an argument in the thread in order to stop it
I fail to understand anything I did wrong in the rules of the game recently. Canada is the most recent one I feel, and it was such a while ago. I still have my opinion the current results of that race are wrong, but I don't want to discuss that any further.
But, I believe you are talking about Hungary. Take a look at the rules again
which as much as it was accidental , it was following the game rules. Plus to add, the majority still agreed with my decision.
The rest of your message I fail to understand and I assume it is connected to the other few sentences.
Finally, I believe I was pretty clear I do not want another argument in this thread. I am ready to give out penalties and race bans.
wha.. I am lost