I'm not even close. Watched 10 secs and got bored.Somehow I'm not as hyped as when it was done with the 919.
I'm not even close. Watched 10 secs and got bored.Somehow I'm not as hyped as when it was done with the 919.
Same. I'm actually wondering if they put a ICE with proper hosepower how much faster they'd go (and how lighter the car would be), you can see the car top speed is on a GT3 level so most of this lap time is coming from aero aloneSomehow I'm not as hyped as when it was done with the 919.
Same. I'm actually wondering if they put a ICE with proper hosepower how much faster they'd go (and how lighter the car would be), you can see the car top speed is on a GT3 level so most of this lap time is coming from aero alone
Imagine a car with a topspeed of 160 km/h (100 mph), the engine produces 70 hp.
If you want that exact same car without modifications to aerodynamics to go twice as fast, you need 560 hp, eight times as much.
That's due to wind resistance, which does not increase squared but cubed.
https://www.quora.com/Does-horsepower-have-diminishing-return!
It much louder, vacuum cleaner I meanThat vacuum cleaner sound... steals all the pathos of a freaking fast lap, sadly
It was the first formula E i have looked at.
Maybe monaco was not the best place for that.
I think it is all down to being able to charge the battery in a short time or change the batteries in a pitstop.Both are some way off.
its cubic, not exponetialA bit boring to watch yes - but probably not to drive.
The reason they have capped this "thing" to max 240-250 km/H is because the drag is increasing more or less "exponential" above that speed.