I also don't get what hampered him...Bit of a misleading title there.
This was a win on merit.
I also don't get what hampered him...Bit of a misleading title there.
hampered: "hinder or impede the movement or progress of..." Mercedes were set for a year of dominance again and Hamilton seemed to be the one who'd lead the Mercedes dominance this year. This didn't turn out to be true in Malaysia, therefore he was hampered. Similarly he could've stood a better chance of winning if it wasn't for Mercedes getting their strategy wrong. I'm no Hamilton fan I'm just pointing out Mercedes didn't get the strategy right at all and Ferrari did. Hope that further explains it for you @Leonardo Chaves @Ho3n3r
hampered: "hinder or impede the movement or progress of..." Mercedes were set for a year of dominance again and Hamilton seemed to be the one who'd lead the Mercedes dominance this year. This didn't turn out to be true in Malaysia, therefore he was hampered. Similarly he could've stood a better chance of winning if it wasn't for Mercedes getting their strategy wrong. I'm no Hamilton fan I'm just pointing out Mercedes didn't get the strategy right at all and Ferrari did. Hope that further explains it for you @Leonardo Chaves @Ho3n3r
I'd say they've got a good chance of winning in Singapore. But not much else from that.
I think a bit much has been made of Ferrari's pace in yesterday's race. Ferrari are very good at managing the temperature of their tyres when they were at critical levels, which is why they were suddenly faster than Mercedes on the long runs.
I don't expect this to continue because except for Singapore, no other race is as hot as Malaysia, so Mercedes will continue to trash the competition in anything that isn't 35C and 90% humidity, which is 17 out of the 19 races this year.
You're not wrong, but looking back, would you have pitted - and double stacked which cost Rosberg a lot more time to wait for a safe release - both cars during the safety car so early on in the race, 1st and 3rd down to 6th and 9th resulting in Vettel leading and saving on tyres even more so whilst Lewis and Nico had to fight through to the front by that point Seb was long gone. At least far enough ahead to lead until the end.But Wolff said that they did not make any mistakes.
Because they were analysing it after the race on SkyF1. And even Ferrari stated that their car handles it's tyres in the hot temperatures better, which it does.How do you know that was the deciding factor? And how can you be sure?
You're not wrong, but looking back, would you have pitted - and double stacked which cost Rosberg a lot more time to wait for a safe release - both cars during the safety car so early on in the race, 1st and 3rd down to 6th and 9th resulting in Vettel leading and saving on tyres even more so whilst Lewis and Nico had to fight through to the front by that point Seb was long gone. At least far enough ahead to lead until the end.
That's a "flexible" interpretation of hampered, the only thing that "impeded" Hamilton today was tire deg which is a normal part of racing and part of the performance envelope of his car.hampered: "hinder or impede the movement or progress of..." Mercedes were set for a year of dominance again and Hamilton seemed to be the one who'd lead the Mercedes dominance this year. This didn't turn out to be true in Malaysia, therefore he was hampered. Similarly he could've stood a better chance of winning if it wasn't for Mercedes getting their strategy wrong. I'm no Hamilton fan I'm just pointing out Mercedes didn't get the strategy right at all and Ferrari did. Hope that further explains it for you @Leonardo Chaves @Ho3n3r