I have stated this in a reply to the introduction of the new Top Gear presentors article by RD before and I will do again now. ...
For me these 3 only will compare to the former outstanding performance of the infamous trio:
If you don't know these people do not bother to reply (I'm Belgian and even I know them) but if chemistry is what you seek, you need this. Thorough knowledge of cars is not necessarely a must, knowledge of performing and presenting however is a HUGE MUST to keep standards up there.
I saw from the trailers broadcast already Chris Evans and Matt Leblanc are forced into their character, Sabine is a excellent driver but she is as boring as German perfection can get, no offence intended.
Chris Harris I appreciated in YouTube very much, not too sure about prescript Top Gear presenting though, not his cup of tea I think, but sure the better reviewer of the lot. But do we need reviewers and good pilots when we have the Stig and the hot lap to prove the car performance?
Top Gear is all about great presenting with quality humour, bringing over chemistry to the audience and showing off fantastic cars with Professional (capital P) camera crew and ultra quality editing.
Hugh Laurie and Rowan Atkinson have so much chemistry as proven in Blackadder, Jonathan Ross is just so wicked in his radio comments and has that right face and attitude to give some in your face replies to the other duo.
But hey, who am I?