You seem to think that someone being stupid and/or having THC in their system justifies someone supposedly not stupid and without THC in their system using their vehicle deliberately as a deadly weapon.
And you have no proof, zero, that he deliberately tried to kill someone by using a vehicle to do so. Fact is, he wouldn't have been hit if the dumbass didn't get out of his car and run the opposite direction towards cars coming at him on a hot track. A person walking the wrong way on a freeway, jumping into traffic or trying to intimidate drivers results in the idiot dying on the freeway is not the fault of the driver bubba.
And the THC aspect of it plays an important role as well, perhaps the THC affected his poor decision to get out and run around on a hot racetrack with the end result of him being hit.
*OH BUT WAIT: "
Tantillo said toxicology reports revealed that Ward was under the influence of marijuana at a high enough level to impair judgment.
So that settles that.
That ain't "not guilty" in any normal justice system that isn't distorted by money and celebrity.
Oh how so wrong you would be. "The Ontario County District Attorney's office took the evidence in Stewart's case to a
grand jury, which found there was
no basis for criminal charges, D.A. Michael Tantillo announced Wednesday."
A grand jury says that you're wrong.
Stewart was guilty of vehicular manslaughter or attempted vehicular manslaughter (had the victim survived) plain and simple.
Get your facts straight. You're wrong again. "The Ontario County District Attorney's office took the evidence in Stewart's case to a
grand jury, which found there was
no basis for criminal charges, D.A. Michael Tantillo announced Wednesday."
'Plain and simple:' He was not guilty. How can one be guilty when there is
no basis for criminal charges that was found by a grand jury?
But just like the rich get away with running over and killing homeless people because the homeless person has no representation, those with "better" representation win over those with less.
I guess Tony paid off the grand jury too eh?
And you must be truly ignorant if you think deals are not done every day in the legal system by both guilty and not guilty parties for a wide variety of reasons that do not relate to who is actually at fault. And the most common reason is $$$$$$.
And you must be truly obtuse and naive to think $$$ came into the grand jurys decision.
That is, until you can come up that Tony paid these jurors to come to their decision.
And on the civil side, the Wards took the money, end of story. Think of it as Tony extending a token of best wishes.
The parents deep level of denial still runs deep, but his actions and the toxicology report say otherwise.