good time to buy I suppose
"success" of Pcars3 and Dirt5 have probably reduced price
"success" of Pcars3 and Dirt5 have probably reduced price
These opus haven't really be taken in account. The price includes the cash entries from dirt 6 to dirt 11, dirt rally 3 to dirt rallly 6, and more substantially f1 2021 to 2025. And other codies' projects. This is how it works.good time to buy I suppose
"success" of Pcars3 and Dirt5 have probably reduced price
I'm wondering what I think is on most peoples' minds. Is this good, or bad? Is Take-Two a good company? Are they another Ubisoft / EA? Will they ruin codemasters? Well there's always somebody to take their place...
arcade game and VR in same sentence, I feel like maybe your expectations where set correctlyI invested 60 euros in PC3, an arcade game I cannot use because it constantly crashes in VR. I hope they will fix it. If not, I don't care, too many better alternatives.
At least they actually finish the gamesTake-Two is turning into EA.
The Dirt series is the "fun" mode. The Dirt rally series is the "hardcore" mode. Much easier and better this way. The fun game can focus on fun stuff. Jumps, pyro, colorful and exciting levels with cool stuff and not as much as a focus on a hardcore physics engine with a physical tire model, asphalt simulation, pooling water, dynamic weather. Leave that to the hardcore sim. It's better to have the two separate, and it's one of the reasons pc3 was such a flop. By one game trying to appeal to both styles of racing fans it didn't attract either of them. It needed to get more serious and own the project cars 3 tag or get less serious and call itself shift 3. The best of both worlds doesn't exist for this style of game.It seems like they should be able to do a little bit of both. For example, in Dirt Rally 3.0 you should be able to go "hardcore" or "fun." I realize that they did that in Dirt 4 and not everyone was thrilled with it. It also doesn't help that if you play in "fun" mode you may get ridiculed for it.
Interesting
Codemasters faces investor backlash over £726m deal
The video games maker's board has recommended the deal with Take-Two Interactive, which is offering cash and shares. But top investors have hit back and suggested the offer is too low.www.thisismoney.co.uk
I'm wondering what I think is on most peoples' minds. Is this good, or bad? Is Take-Two a good company? Are they another Ubisoft / EA? Will they ruin codemasters? Well there's always somebody to take their place...
At least not EA.
The only hope is that they did in the past release some not bad racing games culminating in the rather good F1C, the caveat being that was a very different era.All these independant studios merging into one massive coporate entity is genuinely depressing - think of all the arcade durge that will be released under EA's direction.
Here in the States we have a lot of indignation over the big brewers buying up local microbreweries. However, what the smart ones do (like AB InBev) is not do anything with the brand and let the local guys have their freedom. They infuse capital and they expect a return on their investment.I guess Codies have become hugely profitable and that's why EA made such a large bid.
I wonder where SMS fits into this - didn't Codemasters buy them out last year?
All these independant studios merging into one massive coporate entity is genuinely depressing - think of all the arcade durge that will be released under EA's direction.
oofAt least not EA.
I think that they've learned their lessons from Star Wars Battlefront 2. I also think that giant infusions of cash into development studios are generally good. Reiza could use this!