>SEBASTIAN VETTEL has been told he may have to quit Red Bull if he wants to earn the respect of the rest of the F1 paddock.
Considering the fact that Vettel has already been voted as the best driver on the grid (besides being voted as the best sportsman in Europe, as well as getting some other recognitions), where does this idea that Vettel still needs to "earn the respect of the rest of F1 paddock" comes from? He has done it already. This suggestion that he is yet to earn the respect is obviously biased as it contradicts the hard evidence.
>But still he has seen his position undermined, as "Fernando Alonso continues to be voted as the best driver on the grid by his rivals."
At the best, this statement is misleading as it is not only Alonso but Sebastian who had been voted as the best driver on the grid by his rivals. Besides, it is wrong to say that Alonso "continues" to be voted. There is no continuity. So far Vettel and Alonso take turns in being voted. Hence the so called conclusion that Vettel's position has been seen undermined is based as it stands on a false and misleading premise -- you might think that Vettel has never being voted as the best driver on the grid while Alonso is being voted year in year out. This is an example of how media forms the perceptions of public.
>"And former Red Bull driver David Coulthard believes the 25-year-old might now have to switch to another team to show he can win in another car to silence his critics."
One man (David C.) believes something. And Vettel is supposed to do… what? To go away from the winning team that he has won 3 titles with by now, just to prove that he cannot win without a competitive car? And thus to silence "critics"? That kind of critics he probably will never be able to silence no matter what. It is not so that Vettel has now to gamble with his carrier just to try to satisfy some people that do not, basically, care about him anyway.
>The BBC F1 co-commentator said: “We know Seb is a very talented racing driver but public perception is based on the information we are able to give them."
I find it condescending from this commentator to take for granted that F1 fans around the world are but an ignorant public whose perceptions about the F1 drivers are being based/formed on/by the information supplied by some BBC commentators (the commentators from another TV nets, like RTL for example, may be giving quite different perception on Vettel anyway).
>“Some of Sebastian’s achievements have been incredible in anybody’s book but we like to see people move around teams."
So this whole fuss has really nothing to do with Vettel, nor any driver for that matter. Nor with us, the "public". It is all about the media and their never satisfying need for stories and sensations. And now, again, what is Vettel supposed to do? They like to see people move around… and Vettel is supposed to jump so to satisfy this likening of theirs?
>“We saw Fernando Alonso going up against Lewis Hamilton at McLaren and while it did not work out, he followed his belief and it earned him the respect of the paddock."
Alonso left McLaren due to the lot of conflicts, not that he was winning the titles there and then he decided to go to a lesser team to prove himself. What he did prove in those two years after McLaren was that he could not be competitive in a non competitive car. Alonso did earn the respect, but not that way.
>“Maybe Seb also needs to move somewhere else to get the universal admiration for his talent."
Or maybe not. A question: what is "the universal admiration" supposed to be? Is there something like that even existing? The way to maybe come somewhere close to that "universal admiration" would be to get oneself killed in a spectacular way, in the middle of a race while having won the championship.
>“But meanwhile, he has three world championships, he is very successful in a team that loves him. And it is all about winning, not a popularity contest.”
At last something we can agree on.