Are you a driver Ron?1 million %......just kidding A for me please
that's why both Rens and Dian disliked my posts, because I am not a driver...well thank you very much for me not having a voice when I am not drivingAre you a driver Ron?
My vote is for b, thanks.
that's why both Rens and Dian disliked my posts, because I am not a driver...well thank you very much for me not having a voice when I am not driving
Ron the OP clearly asked for drivers to voice their opinion.that's why both Rens and Dian disliked my posts, because I am not a driver...well thank you very much for me not having a voice when I am not driving
Essentially it does the same and saves time by not having to edit every track.Grip was not the problem, it's the too high of a downforce on this car but ok. I guess the grip was changed from the tires and not the track?
Yes of course doing it from tires is much better than from track, but again, if you ask me it is the downforce which is too high or drag too little or engine too good, because rear traction is not as good as the rest... just my thoughts.. BTW rear tires are weird with the heating on the middle patch. But if u start fiddling with that it will create a difference balance.Essentially it does the same and saves time by not having to edit every track.
DF from what @David Greco says is realistic. He may correct me though.
Yes they are weird, but ISI have stated that the contact patch does not work correctly yet and that the 3 temps consequently are not an indicator of correct pressure or camber. If you use the temps to set these it will not work.Yes of course doing it from tires is much better than from track, but again, if you ask me it is the downforce which is too high or drag too little or engine too good, because rear traction is not as good as the rest... just my thoughts.. BTW rear tires are weird with the heating on the middle patch. But if u start fiddling with that it will create a difference balance.