1: I do not like the cars. They have too much power to be able to control consistently for us slower drivers. They did not provide anywhere as close racing as my last league: the volvo c30 series. If my team is to join another league, it will have to be with regular touring cars. Because that is what is missing from the current RD lineup: V8 supercars fills the WTCC-X gap. And besides, we just got Race On so a WTCC league is sensible, no? Perhaps with only SEATs allowed.
2: The choice of tracks was very good. Most had proper run-off areas, which was vital for these cars in case you put one of the monster torque wheels on a kerb. But it really depends on the car. If you go with lower-powered cars for the next league, I also hope for shorter tracks. Because it makes for closer racing, and requires less preparation time for the lazy drivers. It all depends on the cars. I don't want a GT race on Brands Hatch Indy! But I think that really narrow tracks with little run-off should be reserved for high downforce cars, where precision is easier. Unlike Johan, Istanbul was actually my favourite. Sweeping corners was cool in these cars, but off-banked corners was scary. I'm glad we didn't do zandvoort.
3: Race length: I think the longest races seemed just a little bit too long. The middle (200km) was the most interesting, as it allowed for the best choice of strategies. I don't see the point of having different race lengths in a season though. Unless there is only one exception - like a single endurance race or a double sprint race for one of the events.
4: It really was too bad that so many reserve drivers was not allowed to race, especially since the grid always shrinks toward the end of the season. I think Dietmar's suggestion of letting as many drivers as possible enter the race, but only count the top two finishers of each team for points was a good one. Because I really do like the idea of having teams as well.
5: No. If the WTCC-X cars is what we get, I'm off to iRacing.
6: It was too bad that the forum kinda crumbled midway through the season. It is important to have an active community to keep the interest high among drivers of all skill levels. Since you're asking, I really have to admit that I did not like the forum moderation that happened when lap times became a common subject of discussion. I think moderation and censorship should only be used when members voice strong discontent. And in this case, I think the discontent (but of course good intentions) lie more with the moderators themselves than the people they were trying to protect. I can only speak for myself, but as a slow driver, I must say that discussion of lap times is an interesting debate to read for me,
especially since it often evolves into the pro's mentioning where they were able to gain the most time. But maybe some other slow guys reported the posts as offensive for all I know. All I'm saying is that censorship is usually a bad thing.
I like the idea of having two divisions, as well as the possibility to be demoted or promoted. But as you know, teams and drivers come and go, and there may not even be a second season. How about having a mid-season demotion/promotion for a couple of teams? I know I would have found it exciting to either A: "race with the big boys" or B: "have a chance to get a decent finish after getting walked over for the nth time"
And finally after all this whining I must give HUGE THANKS to RD and all it's staff for putting this amazing service together, and a very special thanks for all the highlights videos after each event. I even show them to non-simracer friends and family every once in a while