Maybe we should replace Zandvoort with AIDA!!!!!
having 2 japanese gp's in 1 season is a bit optimistic imoMaybe we should replace Zandvoort with AIDA!!!!!
having 2 japanese gp's in 1 season is a bit optimistic imo
Or notCall it the Asian GP or something
at least go to shanghai thenCall it the Asian GP or something
at least go to shanghai then
S1: 2001 calendar was like thatTwo races in Germany & Italy in S1, two in Australia in S2. Why would it be a problem?
S1 maybe, but I can't see why S2 is different.different situation imo
+1, Suzuka is awful.Suzuka is awful, I still don't understand how it got more votes than Fuji.
1. Sorry for double post+1, Suzuka is awful.
still don't understand how it got more points than Aida
well, aida wasn't voted for, it's only called as a possible replacement. in s2 there was voted for bathurst so we had 2 australian gp'sS1 maybe, but I can't see why S2 is different.
well I know it had some votes (surely from Takuma, he seems quite passionate about it ).well, aida wasn't voted for
well I know it had some votes (surely from Takuma, he seems quite passionate about it ).
No problems there in my view. Half of the MotoGP calendar in 2013 was Spain, America and Italy. Even now Spanish have 4 GP's (Jerez, Barcelona, Aragon, Valencia)having 2 japanese gp's in 1 season is a bit optimistic imo