This is **** who dont pit win
it's what I said a long time ago. Aidan should adjust the MD so that everyon has the same strategy. Managers and drivers can't adjust their strategy, only GP4 can. Races shouldn't be dependent on strategy, but on skill.This is **** who dont pit win
No the **** is the race is 50% when it is 100% all have min 1 pitstopsit's what I said a long time ago. Aidan should adjust the MD so that everyon has the same strategy. Managers and drivers can't adjust their strategy, only GP4 can. Races shouldn't be dependent on strategy, but on skill.
It can also be adjusted in the MD so that everyone makes a pitstop.No the **** is the race is 50% when it is 100% all have min 1 pitstops
I like it how it is atm, what if everyone made a pitstop? Then we would had mostly the same order as before the pitstops, and harvey still wouldn't had scored points. And all those different strategies mixes it up a little, i had never expected that thomas would score a podium, so that's one of those fun suprisesIt can also be adjusted in the MD so that everyone makes a pitstop.
I writed it before in all f1 race you must change min 1 tyre and ... In this race 0pit stop is in 2,3 or i dont know place and who is do pitstop is in 16 from 10 or wtfI like it how it is atm, what if everyone made a pitstop? Then we would had mostly the same order as before the pitstops, and harvey still wouldn't had scored points
The problem is that normally the AI overtakes on track, to make up for different strategies. Not that much of a problem in a 100% distance race with 1 and 2 stops instead of 0 and 1, as the 2 stoppers then can pass the 1 stoppers while they pit, and make up some time for the 2nd stop.I like it how it is atm, what if everyone made a pitstop? Then we would had mostly the same order as before the pitstops, and harvey still wouldn't had scored points. And all those different strategies mixes it up a little, i had never expected that thomas would score a podium, so that's one of those fun suprises
Real f1 that's indeed the rules, but look at rosberg in sochi, if he would had started on the primes he could had done a 0 stop in a full race, this was just 50% so a higher chance that you can do 39 laps on 1 setI writed it before in all f1 race you must change min 1 tyre and ... In this race 0pit stop is in 2,3 or i dont know place and who is do pitstop is in 16 from 10 or wtf
For that this race it was better when is 100%Real f1 that's indeed the rules, but look at rosberg in sochi, if he would had started on the primes he could had done a 0 stop in a full race, this was just 50% so a higher chance that you can do 39 laps on 1 set
Yeah that's the only thing what bothers me about monaco, 0 overtakes, most boring race so far. If it would had been a 100% race we would had the excitement of the pitstops twice. But the other 80/90 minutes it would still be boringThe problem is that normally the AI overtakes on track, to make up for different strategies.
But as written, with 100% distance the cars with 1 stop more wouldn't have been screwed that much. And yeah, Monaco (and Oran Park) are the most boring gp4 tracks for AI only races.Yeah that's the only thing what bothers me about monaco, 0 overtakes, most boring race so far. If it would had been a 100% race we would had the excitement of the pitstops twice. But the other 80/90 minutes it would still be boring
I agree but also fairerYeah that's the only thing what bothers me about monaco, 0 overtakes, most boring race so far. If it would had been a 100% race we would had the excitement of the pitstops twice. But the other 80/90 minutes it would still be boring
I didn't mention anything about my drivers, but it was still unfair if someone won on 1 less stop. Normally 1 less stop is the faster way.I like it how it is atm, what if everyone made a pitstop? Then we would had mostly the same order as before the pitstops, and harvey still wouldn't had scored points. And all those different strategies mixes it up a little, i had never expected that thomas would score a podium, so that's one of those fun suprises
*2001 (as GP4 is based on that season)and this is not en 1999 season or either this is an fantasy ... Why we cant vote for track ?
Well mostly when you're arguing about something, it should had been a benefit for you, that's why i talked about harvey. And indeed on some tracks 1 stop less is faster. But on tracks where you've overtaking opportunities and a lot of corners (for example spa) i think 1 stop more is fasterI didn't mention anything about my drivers, but it was still unfair if someone won on 1 less stop. Normally 1 less stop is the faster way.
Nothing will benefit us this season, isn't it obvious already?Well mostly when you're arguing about something, it should had been a benefit for you, that's why i talked about harvey. And indeed on some tracks 1 stop less is faster. But on tracks where you've overtaking opportunities and a lot of corners (for example spa) i think 1 stop more is faster
it's possible yes. Also in the MD (it's how I do it for GPTCC)And when is 50% track other 50 can simulate what also kedy do in the simulation carrer