As for track accuracy I was able to compare to the data and it's pretty far off. between the S/F line and T1 the mod ends up 30' too high and is off the rest of the way around.
It's a good start for a track but it is simply built on bad data.
Hi Scott,Scott Barton submitted a new resource:
0.8 - Palmer Motorsports Park
Read more about this resource...
This is my first track. I've raced the track in real life. It's pretty close, but still needs some work, but I've stalled on working on it lately. Main things are smoothing some bumps and fixing camber in some places. If anyone is interested in working on it, I can send you all the files for RTB.
Hey, I am interested in building this for you, can you get the files for me if you still have them?Scott Barton submitted a new resource:
0.8 - Palmer Motorsports Park
Read more about this resource...
Any chance you can share the laz file you got for this? I can't seem to get a good quality file for this.
https://coast.noaa.gov/inventory/ is the site I use to find data. It will tell you where you can download it and give you basic specs like year and resolution.Any chance you can share the laz file you got for this? I can't seem to get a good quality file for this.
Yes I tried that but its not very good quality. It has these blue very rough areas all over the mesh.https://coast.noaa.gov/inventory/ is the site I use to find data. It will tell you where you can download it and give you basic specs like year and resolution.
You are looking at points not a mesh. It's how the points were scanned or processed that it will look like it's "torn". When you convert it to a mesh it will look fine. It's not the most high res data but it's 1000x better than the GE data that was used with this RTB track .Yes I tried that but its not very good quality. It has these blue very rough areas all over the mesh.