Kubica out of Running for Williams Drive, Sirotkin New Favourite?
- Thread starter Paul Jeffrey
- Start date
F_B
Premium
Does 80s until late 90s ring a bell? Glorious F1 times.
Difference is that Williams were a front running team winning races. It's easier to have better drivers when the best race for you because your cars are giving them world championships.
Sad to see how this, once mighty, team has fallen so low.
Kubica isn't good enough for F1 anymore, and given he hasn't driven F1 since 2011, he'd basically be a very old rookie.
Because F1 is supposed to be the very top of car racing, not a playground for people who have driven a few competitive F2/F3 races. That's football, not F1.
Kubica isn't good enough for F1 anymore, and given he hasn't driven F1 since 2011, he'd basically be a very old rookie.
Because F1 is supposed to be the very top of car racing, not a playground for people who have driven a few competitive F2/F3 races. That's football, not F1.
4 8 15 16 23 42 108
Only the 5th-most famous race driver from Kerpen
I can only agree. This is the truth. 15 millions from Lotos Sponsorship. And this demolishes every hint of Williams taking the slower driver for more money.
Except the numbers lie and Sirotkin is coming with 50 millions in his purse....
Exactly what I was thinking and in the news at first I heard Kubica was fasters now the Russion is...
Kyvat is serviceable-- don't think we've seen the last of him.
I'm surprised to see so many Kyvat fans, this guy has already had a lot more 2nd chances than he deserve and than several better Torro Rosso drivers (Vergne, Buemi...).
I don't say he's that bad (but did so many mistakes), but he has shown nothing better than average, he has never shined, and I don't see why he should have so many 2nd chances in a team where there is none most of the time, while there is many rookies which deserve their chance.
I don't say he's that bad (but did so many mistakes), but he has shown nothing better than average, he has never shined, and I don't see why he should have so many 2nd chances in a team where there is none most of the time, while there is many rookies which deserve their chance.
He did ok against Ricciado and would in all probability still be there except for Max' V.
Ok, Max' is very good, but not that good, against his now team mate...but that is history now and Kvyat would be an asset to Williams and give him a chance he deserves.
I'm UK, not Russian!.
Ok, maybe not that much about "pay drivers" more "inexperienced youngsters" is that bothers me about today's Williams. Sad... they were great once. Senna, Mansel, Piquet, Prost,... you think you're great driver? - you better have a career that include Williams team too. And look at them now. Dammit...
You guys have watched this one
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6981046/
? Fun and enjoyable to watch. But so sad at the same time.
Good riddance titles, seems like new team policy.
You guys have watched this one
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6981046/
? Fun and enjoyable to watch. But so sad at the same time.
Good riddance titles, seems like new team policy.
Oh mr Nostradamus, sorry, I didn't recognize you at first.And let's be pragmatic here, Kubica was never going to get a drive.
Most drivers in most series at the pro (expensive) level come with money. Whether it is daddy's or a sponsor makes no difference to me. There are only a few teams (factory) that can afford to pay like Mercedes, Ferrari, Red Bull and Renault. Any other driver that is reaping a salary from the team is of Alonzo status or thereabouts.
So consider that even a pay driver (sponsored or family driven) has to obtain a superlicence in order to even compete means none of them are slugs. They've all won at previous levels and while some may never be a champion all could be at the front of the field in a good car.
I've watched every driver in F1 at other levels and they were all good. I do know though from my own experience that you have to have money and/or a good backer to suceed to the top level. Talent helps get the backers but that is often not enough. If you haven't seen it, there is an excellent documentary about Tommy Byrne who was considered as fast as rich young Ayrton Di Silva (Senna).
So consider that even a pay driver (sponsored or family driven) has to obtain a superlicence in order to even compete means none of them are slugs. They've all won at previous levels and while some may never be a champion all could be at the front of the field in a good car.
I've watched every driver in F1 at other levels and they were all good. I do know though from my own experience that you have to have money and/or a good backer to suceed to the top level. Talent helps get the backers but that is often not enough. If you haven't seen it, there is an excellent documentary about Tommy Byrne who was considered as fast as rich young Ayrton Di Silva (Senna).
Never heard of him/her.
Probably will be a russian in f1 now for the foreseeable, regardless of talent or lack thereof.
That is a shame.
Probably will be a russian in f1 now for the foreseeable, regardless of talent or lack thereof.
That is a shame.
In a money update for anyone that like a good share portfolio. Williams F1 teams share have dropped to $16.59 from $19.20 over the last month lowest its been in 11 months
Alright, guess Vettel, Hamilton and.. yeah, basically everyone shouldn't be in F1 then. They had only a few competitive F3 races... not to mention Kubica himself, who never had a really competitive F3 race except of some Macau outings. Who could count them. And he wasn't fancy doing GP2 either. Just this FR3.5 series.
Fk logic.
Sirotkin is a true talent and a riot to watch, tons of sand on that boy.
If we're talking about skill they should get Wehrlein. If money then Sirotkin. Easy scenario to be honest.
Why, what has Wehrlein proved? He didn't even outperform Ericsson. Now that Mercedes don't pay for him anymore he'll never race in F1 again.
Could not agree more. That's life, and how professional motorsports work. A lot of fans often sound like British motorsport media with their naive rose glasses on.
