Me and Rasmus seem to waste hours watching the fast guys after a race
it's nothing to do with inexperienced handling, it's intentional because it's usually the fast guys, the rest of the grid manage to not cut
We probably will investigate some sort of tracking to help keep it fair
I was thinking about Rupe's post earlier, and I would like to suggest something - review the rule.
Now, please, hear me out.
RD is either full of cheaters, or the rule is too strict and out of place. I'm inclined to say it's the latter.
Every race I have been in ends up with Rupe sounding like a broken record going on about track limits
, which I can tell he is sick of. I know I would be. But it feels to me that the rule is the issue, where you are now not even forgiven if an error puts you off line. Now on top of that, if you're quick you're now suspected of cutting which apparenty needs to be disproven. How fair is it that being fast instantly implies you're cutting? That's not right at all, it means you're guilty until proven innocent.
Asking people to lift off if they run wide, even a little, is also dangerous, especially when cars are behind them and they aren't expecting the car in front to not accelerate from the turn. I understand the logic, to negate the time gain (if there even is one), but it creates chances for needless accidents.
Further, it doesn't reflect well to the non-premium/prospective member when they see bans/warnings here, there and everywhere for exceeding track limits. To someone who doesn't know how strict the rule is, it just looks like multitudes of people are ignoring chicanes, rather than going half a car's width over the white line on most occasions that come to mind.
Using the kerb as track limits is widely accepted in the racing world, so I'm not sure why something different is being forced here. You'll only end up on the astro/grass/gravel/run-off or in the wall if you go further than the outer edge of the kerbs. Abusing run-off is clear cut, and you'll only really end up there as a result of an accident.
I just thought I'd throw my 2p into this now as it's a recurring issue and I think it needs to be looked at, from more than a 'rule is right, you are wrong' angle.