Who wants to explain to me how this gets front page news but SRO running a charity E-Sport sim racing round with three races, proper SRO and guest commentary and a large mix of real Blancpain and sim drivers and there is not so much of a mention of it.
To be realistic though, let's say a vaccine is at least 18 months away, as most experts have predicted. Meanwhile, F1 drivers are supposed to travel all over the world to race unless they decide to skip seasons 2020 and 2021. With this in mind, what is the likelihood of NOT getting infected unless you quarentine yourself for the next 18 months?
Obviously this plan is just Marko talk and they wouldn't be able to take the risk of infecting someone on purpose bearing in mind the possible repercussions, but of the two scenarios, it would probably be better for an athlete to get infected now rather than in the middle of a tough season. It's well known that heavy straining and exercise actually weakens the immune system temporarily. I wouldn't want to be doing a two hour race while potentially having been infected with COVID-19 from the hotel the previous night.
but then again, they may have held other views than their government all alongI love how @Paul Jeffrey and other Britains call Helmut Marko crazy or a sociopath when your government followed the exact same idea of herd immunity until recently.
Herd immunity is inevitable with this virus and is a predictable phenomenon. The spread cannot be tracked in many cases, and people with mild symptoms aren't tested. Action at reducing spread to vulnerable people would reduce mortality rates, but so long as the masses in any infected area remain unimmune, the virus can spread exponentially.The herd immunity approach poses to many risk's, otherwise most western countries would of allowed the virus to flourish. The reality that it is fatal in 30% of cases of humans with underlying health conditions, and a greater number if you're 70+ years old. These 2 facts alone make "Herd Immunity" a very, very bad idea!