Chris
Premium
No I wasn't saying that you were dealing with hypotheticals, I was referring to myself ranking the drivers based on what they've actually accomplished versus what they possibly could have if their roles had been reversed.My assessment is not based on hypothetical data nor does it call for speculation. I'm simply going on head to head records in the same car, since virtually everything else in F1 is tainted by machine, not driver. After eliminating mechanical failures (but not crashes) Sainz out-qualified, out-raced, and made up more positions than Verstappen when they were both at STR. And, frankly, the numbers were not even that close. After getting Kvyat, Sainz dominated that former RBR driver even more. I'm not sure *anyone* on the grid takes care of the machinery better or yanks more out of the equipment than Sainz. Just take a look at his rock steady (and often stunning points hauls) races this year. Why the media ignores him, I'll never know.
I have to say I really disagree with you though. The first four races of 2016, Verstappen outclassed Sainz in every race bar Russia, where he retired (Sainz had a retirement in Bahrain).
Australia:
- Max: 10th
- Carlos: 9th
- Max was miles faster than Carlos in Melbourne, but was unable to get past because of the difficulty in overtaking at Albert park.
- Max: 6th
- Carlos: Retired
- Max: 8th
- Carlos: 9th
- Max: Retired
- Carlos: 12th
I'm not saying Carlos is not quick enough, because he's incredibly good, and is deserving of a top drive IMO, but he's not as good as Max, and I certainly don't agree that he's the best on the grid at extracting the most performance from his car.