Well, having a sponsor, especially in his current condition, is a huge part of the professionalism, that's why I said "a real professional driver".No he does it because of his sponsor. 'Alfa' would not of looked twice at him without Orlen..
Well, having a sponsor, especially in his current condition, is a huge part of the professionalism, that's why I said "a real professional driver".No he does it because of his sponsor. 'Alfa' would not of looked twice at him without Orlen..
On a regular basis, the car was getting worse from practice 1 to practice 3, despite track rubbering in.
There is no denying.... The car was a 'dog'.From yesterday's Swiss' Blick Article:
"The whole year, I've stayed loyal to the team. But the car was a faulty construction. There was nothing to do in the simulator. And one who has no trust in the car, doesn't risk as much. As simple as that."
From yesterday's Swiss' Blick Article:
"Ich blieb das ganze Jahr dem Team gegenüber loyal. Doch das Auto war eine Fehlkonstruktion. Da war auch im Simulator nichts zu machen. Und wer kein Vertrauen ins Auto hat der riskiert weniger. So einfach ist das."
Transl to English:
"The whole year, I've stayed loyal to the team. But the car was a faulty construction. There was nothing to do in the simulator. And one who has no trust in the car, doesn't risk as much. As simple as that."
Especially a team that's hanging at the rear end of the pack, focuses its resources on one car.
Someone asked me to elaborate. So as a matter of fact, RK had to use a chassis that had multiple the mileage of the other one. For a good half of the season. How's that for a fair chance?
Throughout the whole season (not including two GP weekends), the car was making regress from FP1 to FP3.
Let that sink in. On a regular basis, the car was getting worse from practice 1 to practice 3, despite track rubbering in.
Even an amateur driver is able to improve times, purely because the track's surface progresses throughout the weekend. Surprisingly, this was not the case with RK car.
Say what you want, the facts defend themselves.
He did, but what does that change? Still Robert brought the team the only point and resulting money, despite being handled as no 2 all year.I get that you are a big Kubica fan but the facts & stats dont lie.Russell out qualified Kubica 19-0.
Robert moaned about his chassis & they swapped chassis for Spanish GP.Russell was 1.2 seconds faster in Kubicas chassis in qualy.https://www.racefans.net/2019/12/09/team-mate-battles-2019-the-final-score-russell-vs-kubica/
View attachment 342034
If you don't trust the car, then don't get into the car.
Give it to somebody else.
It is as simple as that.
I like Robert...think he is a good driver.
His time has come and his limitation coupled with the change of the cars, has seen the sport and technology move on from when he was at the top of his game.
It happens.
He got his *** handed to him by Russell in the same equipment.
Stop making silly excuses.
Yeah, sometimes maybe ... taking high risks until he hit a bridge or a guard rail.He smacked Loeb, Ogier, Tanak, and company ass in WRC stages with a private car, minimal budget and crew, while being the boss and logistics organiser of his own team.
Maybe Kimi is so cool he only used one of them anyway.Compare that to Kimi Raikkonen's WRC results, with two healthy arms.
Yes, indeed, but not his driving skills.Mind you, the condition of K's arm had significantly improved since the WRC times.
To 'what' exactly?
A bit part number 3 driver who probably only got the spot because of the oil company.
I would love for him to get some track time and do well, prove that it was Williams and not him, unfortunately I think that ship has sailed.
I believe GR is an awesome driver, but never the real difference between the two equals that seen in Williams.
But if Kubica's poor results were down to him having a bad chassis all season, how do you explain why Russell was so much faster in Kubica's car in Spain?
Well, as an engineer, but without having your magic crystal ball, I would say that this may be caused simply by different aero settings (more downforce in corners, more drag on straights).Robert was actually often faster through the corners-from entry to exit, losing on straights.
But if Kubica's poor results were down to him having a bad chassis all season, how do you explain why Russell was so much faster in Kubica's car in Spain?
Other thing I know of, is that RK was using other engine map.
Quite simply both cars had same maps installed, but the team decided which maps are used and enabled. No rocket science involved here.
This can even be noticed if you watch onboards from both cars on F1 TV Pro.
Robert was actually often faster through the corners-from entry to exit, losing on straights.
Of course he can't drive a loose car, that's why he won WRC stages on gravelSo was RK running more wing,going faster through the corners & then slowed on the straights because he could not drive a more loose car with less downforce due to his arm?
You will see him this February driving in F1.i wish to see Kubica in Blancpain series or DTM.