@Ronnie Böhme and
@Craig Dunkley , taking advantage of your kindness.
I've compared both setups, Ronnie and mine (attached).
I undertand Ronnie levels the car height and the front Aero to compensate for the floating front. I use a diferent approach, lower the rear to help overpower and avoid grounding with more Wheel rate, one notch. Still the light front, though more controlable power, and I reduce the Diff. Power only one notch, to have better traction, but controlable thanks to the lower rear.
Obviously my back Aero is too light for the 2nd section, but it gives me more weight to the front. The car turns in fine, more front Aero makes it oversteery, so I set 1 Front Aero. I agree I don't compensate the raw speed with the lost time in the 2nd sector. But that can be my lack of dexterity.
The tyre pressures are weird in my case because I set left side higher than right side. True that my LR was half of the lap one bar higher.
My Dampers are higher set, so to help braking and help fast changes of direction, I may have light front but responsive, it may be wrong.
It is clear why you set the higher gears, to compensate the Aero.
The Aligment is another unfathomed mystery for me. I always use less Camber that everybody. In this case I have enough turn in, and I don't want to worsen braking, also more Camber makes me slide at the corner entry. Obviously I am wrong.
So, would you mind trying my setup and see what can you achieve?
The same setup with Slicks, 100% Turbo and 17 Litres allow me a 51.656
and Would you be kind, both of you, to let me know my wrongly assumtions and logic behind my setup?
Right now I am in the process of understanding the effects of those changes, more or less I know what they do, but why is it better to alter first one parameter and not the other?
Thanks again to both of you.
Of course you have matters to attend, I completely understand if you don't have time to dwell on this.