Content Manager and VR

[Deleted member 379375]

I have Content Manager and VR, After loads of testing in order to get the best FPS I have gone back to a vanilla AC and generally do not run CM as for some reason I can't get to the bottom of I get 45 FPS when running CM (89.5 reported FPS without). .That;s at Spa with online with a full grid. I have removed any shaders and mods and reinstalled AC and CM after deleting the CM folder in My Documents but still have the issue.is anyone else seeing this?

How about some people test with and without and post their results. One thing to note I had to reboot the PC last time I tested to get my 90 FPS back.

 

[Ryno917]

MAARTENSWESIM just changed launcher type, but still using CM with CSP.

That's what I figured. And of course the frame rate is going to be lower running CSP. It's injecting a bunch of new features, and those features require resources.

 

[MAARTENSWESIM]

Well... of course CSP is going to lower the framerate. Did you try launching through CM with CSP completely disabled/uninstalled? Even if you turn off all the features available to turn off there's probably plenty of back-end elements still running without options to disable. Give 'er a go with it uninstalled and compare then.

But why does CSP make such a bigger impact with AppID than when i changed to Official?
Have tried uncheck the Active tick box under General patch settings but with no difference with the default launcher AppID. I could try uninstall CSP but i doubt it has something to do with that.

 

[MAARTENSWESIM]

Interesting, tried both launchers, official and AppID with benchmark and fpsVR and got almost identical results, Official was even a tad slower in one of 4 runs but statistically seems the same.
Not disputing your experience, wondering what is it in your or other users with similar findings systems that might cause that.
Is it paid CM, or free version, latest CSP patch (205), I assume?

It's the paid CM and i run latest CSP patch 0.1.25-preview205

 

[Authense]

In my setup I run CM as replacement and latest version of CSP and it has no impact on FPS regarding the launcher or the pure fact, that I run CSP. Of course CSP itself can have huge impact depending the tweaks I activate..

 

[Deleted member 197115]

CSP went a long way and unless some ridiculous PP FX, are activated, with performance optimization options checked, can outperforms vanilla AC.

For different launchers, I can only see difference in loading time, not performance.
This is WMR (OpenBR), may be Oculus is different.

 

[Authense]

Agreed - PP FX only outperforms my 2080ti...

 

[MAARTENSWESIM]

I could do a test with oculus - different loaders and then compare it with monitor - different loaders. Perhaps it's something in conjunction with the Oculus-driver