sure? also still have the i73770k, as looking at gaming benchmarks these don't appear to that far behind the skylake in performance.my i7 3770K isn't powerful enough. GUTTED!
Nice, what is your shipping date?Pre-ordered mine but frankly, not too happy with the 742 EUR that costs for us Europeans and in general for the relatively high price. Hopefully this will not drive people away as we need big install base if VR is to succeed. Looking at the outrage on the internet, HTC/Steam are pretty much put in the corner. They cannot release with a higher price after the negative press Oculus is getting. ..time will tell I guess.
Was planning on getting both but at this stage, will stick to one VR set for the time being.
Having said all that, I still cannot wait for racing in VR and very excited for when CV1 arrives at my doorstep
I guess this software just compares your hardware to a list that somebody put in there and not making any real performance tests...Their compatibility check software is... surprising. I have an AMD FX8150 that is, according to benchmarks, more powerful than the recommended i5-4590 but it still tells me my CPU does not meet the requirements. Of course, I am aware that some drivers could take advantage of Intel specific technologies which might impact the performance but it still looks a bit shady to me, I have the feeling they are promoting Intel rather than providing accurate information.
Nice, what is your shipping date?
Would be awesome to get some feedback from someone here!
Maybe you could persuade me if it is awesome Cause, I could afford it but price pisses me off too much atm
I read from some people that looking a bit farther away in a racing sim VR results in a pixel mess And that with a DK 2
ANYONE here that could confirm that?
...CV1 has not improved much over dk2 regarding resolution
...but Palmer said it's soo much better hope he is not talking **** again
And the price is utterly ridiculous, it sure is an interesting gadget but that makes me re-consider getting a video projector instead.
Good point Galin!I have a PJ...if you are going to spend so much money, get VR
I can understand the disappointment of false expectations (the biggest problem for Oculus really) but those other options are simply not as good IMO and will not be cheaper.
Not cheaper, that is true and possibly more hassle but they cover other needs that the VR option does not, like playing fighting games with friends... There is also the fact that my right eye does not work, I know for sure it will not be a problem with a projector but with VR, I have read conflicting information and I wouldn't want to spend a small fortune to end up with something I cannot use either because it tires my left eye too fast or because the field of view is not compatible with my condition.
Then I would definitely recommend to test a VR headset before buying one! I could imagine that causing problemsNot cheaper, that is true and possibly more hassle but they cover other needs that the VR option does not, like playing fighting games with friends... There is also the fact that my right eye does not work, I know for sure it will not be a problem with a projector but with VR, I have read conflicting information and I wouldn't want to spend a small fortune to end up with something I cannot use either because it tires my left eye too fast or because the field of view is not compatible with my condition.
And this absolutely is a valid point. Depending on your needs, you have to decide which option is best for you. I am just saying that for racing, space sims, 1st person exploration games etc, (non couch MP) VR is the better option when compared to PJ (and any other device for that matter)
One thing you need to remember with PJ is that you need to dedicate a room really and have the possibility of making it dark at any moment or you will not be able to use your PJ during the day.
Not here, I got my 3 24" monitors for about $650 total (vs. $914 for the rift) and I already had 2 cause my PC needs monitors. I just built the stand out of chipboard that was lying around though so no cost for that.I know the price is high but 3 monitors + stand is still more than that so it's still the more reasonable option IMO for simracing but in general, the price is too high for the mass market. Then again, the PC requirements are not really mass market either
Not here, I got my 3 24" monitors for about $650 total (vs. $914 for the rift) and I already had 2 cause my PC needs monitors. I just built the stand out of chipboard that was lying around though so no cost for that.
I was budgeting the total (including whatever PC upgrade ends up necessary - ideally just a $20 usb 3.0 pci card, but maybe GPU or CPU) as under $1000, so now there's no point in me buying it until I can raise the budget a bit cause if my PC doesn't run it, I have nothing spare to upgrade that.