Nobody is saying he´s ****. Some of us just realize that when he won his titles he had two of the most dominant cars of all-time.Who in the history of F1 has won the Championship twice and turned out to be a **** driver?
Well, there's that Clark guy. I heard everyone thought he was a pretty terrible driver.
Or maybe they said he was a terrific driver.
And yeah, raw pace wise, Hamilton is probably at the top of the current F1 drivers. He's had a good season start, but some bad luck in Bahrein.
And honestly, saying Vettel is a bad driver implies that all the other drivers in F1 aren't that good either. Even with the best car (which the Red Bull was last year), a bad driver wouldn't have won 11 races, with a total of 17 podiums in 19 races, and just 1 retirement.
Nobody is saying he´s ****. Some of us just realize that when he won his titles he had two of the most dominant cars of all-time.
Last car he had was on some tracks closer to a second clear of anyone else.
the only person he had to fight for the title was his teammate.
If you compare those titles with Raikkonens, Hamilton´s, Alonso´s they all fought like warriors throughout the season to win their championship.
Back then teams were equal. 09-10-11 was loaded with loopholes or other weird stuff.
If the cars stay equal as they are now and no team runs away pace-wise and Vettel wins the title i can garantuee you i will honor him as highly as the rest of the the Top drivers.
And honestly, saying Vettel is a bad driver implies that all the other drivers in F1 aren't that good either. Even with the best car (which the Red Bull was last year), a bad driver wouldn't have won 11 races, with a total of 17 podiums in 19 races, and just 1 retirement.
Not sure but second is my guess.What's the lowest position Vettel has won the race from?
I think it was from 3rd (Malaysia 10)What's the lowest position Vettel has won the race from?
I don't think he will BE like any one you suggested he will be Vettel and until he has the Fire to fight then he will try to do his bestI think it was from 3rd (Malaysia 10)
Since how many Seasons is Vettel in a competitive car? 2009-2012
Hamilton = 2007-2012
Alonso= 2003-2012
etc.
man give Vettel a few years. Im not saying he's the best but let´s just wait a little. Maybe with more experience he is the next Schumacher? or maybe the next Massa? Who knows...
You may exclude 2009 from both Hamilton and Alonso About Vettel - despite his stupid finger this guy is sublime tallent and he showed this in 2008 with the crappy Toro Rosso. In 2011 Webber couldn't get as much 2nd places as Vettel took wins in the same carI think it was from 3rd (Malaysia 10)
Since how many Seasons is Vettel in a competitive car? 2009-2012
Hamilton = 2007-2012
Alonso= 2003-2012
etc.
man give Vettel a few years. Im not saying he's the best but let´s just wait a little. Maybe with more experience he is the next Schumacher? or maybe the next Massa? Who knows...
Didn't he also race in 2007 for Toro Rosso and finished 4th in Shanghai?You may exclude 2009 from both Hamilton and Alonso About Vettel - despite his stupid finger this guy is sublime tallent and he showed this in 2008 with the crappy Toro Rosso. In 2011 Webber couldn't get as much 2nd places as Vettel took wins in the same car
Yep, exactlyDidn't he also race in 2007 for Toro Rosso and finished 4th in Shanghai?
Ya this is the point i was saying no driver can win a Championship with out best packageAlright let's look on this topic from a diferent perspective.
So let's say a fast/talented driver wants to win the championship, what will he need to win the championship? (A fast car)
Would then any of the F1 legends in history of F1 be able to win todays F1 championship with a slow car like, Sauber's or Ferrari's? (nope)
Button complitly dominated the year which he won the championship and Schumi did the same (not to mention several times). So did Vettel two seasons in a row and he have been called a spoiled driver just because he had a fast car and now he doesn't... (But what about Button and Schumi?)
Plus all talented drivers start in a slow F1 team and eventually get into a fast team. (sure, Hamilton was an exception but do you find him being a very slow driver who lacks talent compared to the other 5 champions?) Vettel have taken that path by driving for Toro Rosso and then got into RBR and challenged Button in 2009 for the championship with a car that seemed like being in Mclarens place in 2010 while Brawns car was in Red Bulls place in 2010.
In 2010 Vettel won the championship in almost the same way as Raikkonen in 2007 , by simply being consistant, having a competitive car and simply having the right timing as Alonso and Hamilton screwed up their chanses. (which is kind of a mirror of what happen to Webber and Alonso in Abu Dhabi) Surely some might say that you can't compare this two complitly diferent years but my point is that Vettel didn't win his championships as easely as people tend to think.
I belive that Vettel is as talented as the other 5 champions but I belive that people think he just had a very simple path in his career and forget that the man who got into a fast car in his rookie year in F1 was Hamilton and ALMOST won the championship in 2007. (and people don't call him as spoiled as Vettel...)
Hopefully we can have a friendly argument about this topic.
Cheers.
Where did i say that?But didn't Ferrari have the fastest car in 2007 compare to the rest of the grid? (I think you said so last year in an very old topic)