I actually disagree. After Roland's death, Senna was planning on re-creating the Grand Prix Drivers Association to assist in making Formula One safer. With Senna and his great experience and insight into motor racing, its possible that it would have become much safer much earlier, thus no deaths after Roland in 1994.Saving Senna would mean there would be more than just Jules Bianchi killed in an F1 car since 1994.
His death was sad, but he didn't die in vain, as the safety crusade that followed only made F1 better.
Hm, but which years are a 3.5L n/a legal:I'm guessing I'd only have to backtrack to early/mid 60s (when you factor in how much more reliable the Camry would be, even if it's not the fastest on every track).
Ha, good catch!Hm, but which years are a 3.5L n/a legal:
1947-1953 (up to 4.5L)
1987-1994 (up to 3.5L)
Kinda cuts down your options
Senna would have tried, but it would have taken a few years. His death caused massive knee jerk reactions that happened instantly within the season. The death of a superstar causes quicker change than the words of a superstar sadly.I actually disagree. After Roland's death, Senna was planning on re-creating the Grand Prix Drivers Association to assist in making Formula One safer. With Senna and his great experience and insight into motor racing, its possible that it would have become much safer much earlier, thus no deaths after Roland in 1994.
I actually disagree. After Roland's death, Senna was planning on re-creating the Grand Prix Drivers Association to assist in making Formula One safer. With Senna and his great experience and insight into motor racing, its possible that it would have become much safer much earlier, thus no deaths after Roland in 1994.
Same thing with nascar, hans and dale earnhard sr.The death of a superstar causes quicker change than the words of a superstar sadly.