Le Mans Ultimate: 2024 Content Comes In Four Packs, Imola in July

Le Mans Ultimate 2024.png
Image: Studio 397
Fans of Le Mans Ultimate can look forward to more 2024 content soon, as the first of four packs is launching in July - including Imola, as Studio 397 and Motorsport Games confirmed.

When Le Mans Ultimate released in early access back in February, the title contained all the cars and tracks from the 2023 FIA World Endurance Championship season. But after releasing the BMW M Hybrid V8 in the week leading up to this year's 24 Hours of Le Mans, more 2024 season content is set to start rolling out.

With visual confirmation, the Alpine A424 and Lamborghini SC63 Hypercars are on their way onto the platform, as are the GT3 cars that replace the GTE class from 2024 onwards. However, the question was when and how exactly this additional 2024 content would launch. Now, we have a better idea of that, thanks to the LMU July run-down.


Four DLC Packs​

The first of four changes to the 2024 WEC schedule from last year is the Imola circuit, and the track will feature in the first DLC releasing at the end of July. The remaining three tracks - Lusail, Interlagos and Circuit of the Americas - seem to be arriving individually in the rest of the DLC pack releases. Considering that two of the three respective rounds at the tracks have not happened yet (the exception being Lusail), this makes sense - the LMU team did scan Imola at the actual WEC round, after all.

The four new Hypercar entries for this year will also be included in these packs, namely the Isotta Fraschini Tipo 6 LMH-C, the aforementioned Lamborghini SC63 and Alpine A424, and finally the Peugeot 9X8, which saw an extensive rework compared to the 2023 car already in the game. Most prominently, the 2024 9X8 now features a rear wing, as debuted at the 6H of Imola in April.

LMU BMW M4 GT3.jpg

The LMU dev team have already shown their work in progress of the GT3 cars with the BMW M4 GT3. Image: Studio 397

GT3 After Hypercars Are Complete​

After the completion of the 2024 Hypercar grid, the GT3 cars will be making their eagerly-anticipated debut in the sim. These will include the Aston Martin Vantage AMR GT3 Evo, BMW M4 GT3, Ferrari 296 GT3, McLaren 720S GT3 Evo, Lamborghini Huracán GT3 Evo 2, Ford Mustang GT3, Lexus RC F GT3, Chevrolet Corvette Z06 GT3.R and the 2024 Le Mans LMGT3 class-winning Porsche 911 GT3 R (992).

Two of those cars will be added to the platform free of charge to early access players like the BMW M Hybrid V8, whereas the remaining seven - along with the four new hypercars and the four new tracks - will be in paid DLC packs. If you intend to get all four, LMU will have a season pass that can be bought and work out at better value than buying them all individually.

Additionally, liveries for the LMP2 class field from the 2024 24 Hours of Le Mans will be added in time to the game. Once we know when the LMU season pass can be bought as well as the first of the four DLC packs themselves, we will keep you updated, of course.

Which piece of upcoming Le Mans Ultimate content are you most eagerly anticipating? Let us know on Twitter @OverTake_gg or in the comments below!
About author
Luca [OT]
Biggest sim racing esports fan in the world.

Comments

@overtake: Might be time to do a pole on if ppl in the future will support early access or do they want full release 1.0. LET THE PPL SPEAK!
 
Well, maybe the difference between a sim 24 years old and today sim it is HUGE. To be honest the price difference it is too small to reflect the difference in quality and amount of work required for today's titles.
As you have said back then, they put all on ONE CDROM. But, I'm old enough to have in my desk drawers Floppy disks 1.22 MB with few games on it. This means absolutely NOTHING. That was the past.
Today games? At least 30 CDROMs. And I can bet they don't have 30 x employees.
You can't compare a sim 24 years old with a today's modern one.
Today's complexity of a sim have a price. If you don't want to pay that price, it is OK. Internet it is full with old games. Just search for "free old racing games PC"

View attachment 766451
I think you got off track! :D
To clarify that was obviously not my point.
Just used the CDROM analogy for comparison, where for a title - a very specific title - you could buy a finished product. So finished that it was physical avalable and no text inside the cover informing that you could download valuable updates with a dial-up modem.
What I just want to point out is that when a publisher sells a product with a very narrow title referring to a very specific, limited content - then you could previously expect this content to be present.
And not that you can buy a "beta version" where "everything gets better later both with content and graphics options".

Just to be clear: I have absolutely nothing against the DLC business model in general :)
(only micro transaction business models, where the word 'micro' can now be questioned for several games nomatter platform).

However, it disappoints me that you have to wait xx time to get the "whole package".
Hence my point that in that case the game could have been called something else.
With such a limited title and even the word "ultimate" - as a conversation stopper that something better would come at all. Then you shoot yourself in the foot by selling the skin before the bear is shot.

That was sort of my point regarding the sale of finished products before.

And I have no doubt that the licensing of all official content has since become outrageously expensive, seeing opportunities to capitalize on everything.

As I said - a slightly less specific title, such as "rF2 Endurance" or something like that. So you start with the bar set low and everything just comes as a plus of DLC goodies. I can't get particularly excited about the sales news about a new livery. It just doesn't really work for me, to be honest.

Nota bene: I know where to find abandonware and my old CDROMS, quite a legacy collected here through the decades :)
 
Last edited:
Premium
I don't see anyone against the concept of early access, More so the exploitation of it to skip the part of providing a functional and featured game and going straight to the selling addons part.

I was all onboard with the title until they played their hand, and demonstrated their contempt for the market (that's us, Still find it odd this is being championed by some). The price of the game and/or the DLC is mostly irrelevant from my perspective when the practices driving it are questionable.
 
Last edited:
I don't see anyone against the concept of early access, More so the exploitation of it to skip the part of providing a functional and featured game and going straight to the selling addons part.

Given we are just about to see another game changer of an update for AMS2 at 1.6 and ACC had it's own at 1.9...

Neither of which fall under the "functional" line for their features that LMU is missing if we go by the standards people have for LMU's "non-functional" features and have sold plenty of add ons... Both have had major MP problems over the last year with their dedicated servers and there's ACC's infamous VR and AI issues whilst AMS2s needle gets moved often and far enough to make offline championships a drawn out process of constantly figuring out where the difficulty should be...

I find that argument moot for sim racing these days as it's just par for the course... It's accepted practice to have a fully released title that is not functional or fully featured with DLC piled on top... LMU just has the right tag for their title in the state that it is... I'd much rather AMS2 and ACC still be listed as EA or BETA projects considering how they've been developed over the years...

ACE with it's 5 years of development before it's release this year should hopefully be the key to bucking this trend, but I expect it to have it's own teething problems during it's EA phase as well... Plus some DLC as par for the course...
 
gonna wait for when the eventual 1.0 release will be on discount, which will happen relatively quickly.
it was for me personally the right decision to not get into EA at all (not even trial 2h).
 
Actually, the great George Carlin explained this a long time ago when he talked about voting:

"I don’t vote ’cause I believe if you vote, you have no right to complain. People like to twist that around. I know, they say, they say: “well if you don’t vote you have no right to complain”. But where’s the logic in that? If you vote, and you elect dishonest, incompetent people, and they get into office and screw everything up, well you are responsible for what they have done, YOU caused the problem, you voted them in, you have no right to complain. I on the other hand, who did not vote, WHO DID NOT VOTE. Who in fact did not even leave the house on election-day, am in no way responsible for what these people have done, and have every RIGHT to complain as loud as I want, about the mess YOU created, that I had nothing to do with. "
So how about voting honest and competent people?
 
I don't see anyone against the concept of early access, More so the exploitation of it to skip the part of providing a functional and featured game and going straight to the selling addons part.

I was all onboard with the title until they played their hand, and demonstrated their contempt for the market (that's us, Still find it odd this is being championed by some). The price of the game and/or the DLC is mostly irrelevant from my perspective when the practices driving it are questionable.
What you kind of miss at this point is that LMU is pretty much filled with all the features that you have in most racing sims and I would argue that some of it's components work alot better than some competing products where the developer simply refuses to develop those aspects despite being out of EA since years. The things that LMU really lacks are a season mode and proper VR/TrackIR support. And I would kind of understand your sentiment if they had done nothing since release, but there have been plenty of updates with features that people requested and even free content so that people aren't forced to buy the 2024 DLC cars. I find it hilarious that people find any of this offensive or bad practice when everything they have to do is vote with their wallet. Do what you want and you are ofcourse free to critizice a product, but the noise that some of the people make who haven't even bought the game is pretty ridiciolous. Just let people who have fun and enjoy the title allready do the same. It's funny that people who simply enjoy the title are labaled as fanboys. Live and let live.
 
Its publisher*

Its and it's are different things. One his possessive ("its tootbrush"), the other is an abbreviation between pronoun and verb, it is ("it's his toothbrush").

They often get confused but it's important not to do so as they convey very different meanings.
Thanks, I keep that in mind for my next post. But my wild guess is, that everybody got it.
 
Delighted with this game. It is a wonder. Obviously it's in the early stages... but I'm really enjoying it.
 
Its publisher*

Its and it's are different things. One his possessive ("its tootbrush"), the other is an abbreviation between pronoun and verb, it is ("it's his toothbrush").

They often get confused but it's important not to do so as they convey very different meanings.
If you are going to be a pedant about people's grammar, you had best not include spelling errors in your examples :).

Possessive apostrophes are a thing. Congratulations on picking out the one word where for no reason other than, we just don't, it isn't written but the sequence of letters and pronunciation are identical.

 
Last edited:
What you kind of miss at this point is that LMU is pretty much filled with all the features that you have in most racing sims and I would argue that some of it's components work alot better than some competing products where the developer simply refuses to develop those aspects despite being out of EA since years. The things that LMU really lacks are a season mode and proper VR/TrackIR support. And I would kind of understand your sentiment if they had done nothing since release, but there have been plenty of updates with features that people requested and even free content so that people aren't forced to buy the 2024 DLC cars. I find it hilarious that people find any of this offensive or bad practice when everything they have to do is vote with their wallet. Do what you want and you are ofcourse free to critizice a product, but the noise that some of the people make who haven't even bought the game is pretty ridiciolous. Just let people who have fun and enjoy the title allready do the same. It's funny that people who simply enjoy the title are labaled as fanboys. Live and let live.
I really enjoy the driving now in LMU since they fixed the ridiculous cold tire behavior it had at release. But it still far from having all the features needed for a full modern game release.

No championship mode
No driver swaps
The different AI drivers have no individual performance/personalities variance,it seems to be a bit random sometimes
No VR
No mid game save
Subpar mechanical and visual damage model
Can't keep watching the a race after you retire

And that's with about 10 hours of playtime, so I am sure there's more. I think what triggers many people is that before you start selling DLC, you should get some base features available, like a championship mode, driver changes and mid race saves, which are essential for endurance racing.
 
The game is not full release. How is this such a hard concept to grasp? I hate the way the modern gaming has gone but guess what? Many, many people are responsible for taking it to a place that we're currently at, by supporting terrible business practices and all the things that go against our best interests as customers. However, I would argue that sim racing is such a niche section of the market and pretty much everyone involved in creating games for us are in no way comparable to the EA's, Ubisofts, Activisions etc. of the world and indeed have not only much smaller teams but also (and more importantly) an absolutely INSUFFERABLE user base to satisfy. I've not got a great regard for people in general, but sim racers are, without a shadow of ANY doubt, the worst group of people on the face of the earth.

This thread is testament to that.

I'm gonna go enjoy the $45 AUD broken, unfinished excuse for an early access title that I worked one hour to pay for (I have 100 hours+ in the game so far, so by sim racers standards, I'm nearly at the break even point of value for money.....), while everyone here can revel in each others filth.
 
Last edited:
This thread is testament to that.
Not just this thread, but yes, pretty disgusting.
Might be time for OT to start a closer monitoring/moderating of the same few people making it bad for all of us, an ignore list can only do so much. :D
Glad for you that you are enjoying LMU.
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Luca Munro
Article read time
3 min read
Views
15,304
Comments
166
Last update
Back
Top