Verstappen was in front.1. They were completely even side by side, otherwise they would not have made contact with their front tires, but one would've touched the others wing, or sidepod, etc.
View attachment 312938
2. If you really think Leclerc is at fault for the collision you're straight up delusional.
This reads like some Verstappen-Ultra love letter, which all F1 fans really appreciate.
No we saw destruction derby today.No further action.
Max keeps his win.
We actually saw racing today.
Because it wasn't fair.Most of people complain about boring races and FIA interfering always with races.
This move was not boring and FIA "didn't" interfere.
Still... most complains.
i can just imagine a modern era FIA drivers debriefing with Ayrton Senna
FIA: Ayrton what is your opinion on the overtaking maneuver by Max.
Ayrton: Well, If you don't go for the gap.............
FIA: Yes but, we don't really encourage gaps anymore, we would prefer you to overtake, with the assistance of DRS, on the straights only?
With all due respect: you might be wrong?The FIA is at fault here.
That kind of stuff is terrible for the sport and especially for us, the audience.
We want to watch close racing WITH side by side action.
But this **** where the overtaking guy can just push the outside guy wide in a proper Hamilton-esque move ist simply terrible.
I'll never understand why the FIA doesn't implement a very simple rule that applies to tight corners:
If you are attacking on the inside, you gotta stay on the inside.
That way the outside guy gets a change to counter and there is a much bigger chance for a great run-off towards the next corner. Which is what the audience wants to see.