Nine times out of ten, when the GMA propose to change atrack layout or introduce a new track, I normally vote on the following criteria:
(1) Do I want to make the season longer?
(2) Do I want to abstain and get a +1 Vote for a later topic?
These are normally my choices because when presented with the 'track layout' of the proposed change, it doesn't really offer me any details which should by my KEY influence - namely "Will my car be suited or unsuited to this new track!"
So this is just a cheap and cheerful image of all the tracks, all the layouts, all the critical parts (green tics), all the useful parts (yellow exclemations), tyre wear rates and fuel burn rates. There's also a little bit of other misc information regarding track lengths, climate, etc.
With this information, you can now reference the proposed track changes and decide if the change will benefit your season or be detremental to your season.
(1) Do I want to make the season longer?
(2) Do I want to abstain and get a +1 Vote for a later topic?
These are normally my choices because when presented with the 'track layout' of the proposed change, it doesn't really offer me any details which should by my KEY influence - namely "Will my car be suited or unsuited to this new track!"
So this is just a cheap and cheerful image of all the tracks, all the layouts, all the critical parts (green tics), all the useful parts (yellow exclemations), tyre wear rates and fuel burn rates. There's also a little bit of other misc information regarding track lengths, climate, etc.
With this information, you can now reference the proposed track changes and decide if the change will benefit your season or be detremental to your season.
You are really a hard-worker. 
