I'm perfectly ready to believe that their system does a great job.From the link on the motor the Accuforce uses:
" The simple fact is, a stepper system couldn't even be used for the purpose of steering simulation. It is not a suitable technology. "
Do you want the Accuforce to be classified as a standard stepper motor for some reason?
This is a more technical paper describing Hybrid Stepper motor. As you can see it's still a stepper with finite incremental "steps" and detent torque.Since it isn't a true stepper or servo motor being used in the Accuforce, I am not sure what you are getting at with your link. When talking about the motor the Accuforce uses, they even state a Stepper motor cannot be used for a wheel.
From the link on the motor the Accuforce uses:
" The simple fact is, a stepper system couldn't even be used for the purpose of steering simulation. It is not a suitable technology. "
Do you want the Accuforce to be classified as a standard stepper motor for some reason?
Barry said:The Accuforce uses a smaller stepper motor that just can’t deliver the smoothness, precision, and fidelity that those system can when running the much more expensive Kollmorgen Servo motors. But of course they cost more!
In simple terms, a fast and highly intelligent motor control logic drives a stepper motor as though it were a servo.
I'm perfectly ready to believe that their system does a great job.
However, I've read their website in the past and I concluded that they are playing with words in a way that is quite likely to confuse people.
Looking at the quotes you've included here, you say they declare that it isn't a stepper motor. In fact they don't say that at all - they say that it isn't a "stepper system" because that "couldn't even be used".
I'm nigh-on certain that it IS a stepper motor in their system, but the hybrid bit (combining it with a position sensor) is how they are (quite honestly) able to call the whole thing a servo system.
Like I say, I'm perfectly ready to believe the whole package is nice (I drive a G27 which has gears in it, and the notchiness of that doesn't get in the way of the driving experience). The only way to judge that is to either try it yourself or hear it from someone you trust.
This is a more technical paper describing Hybrid Stepper motor. As you can see it's still a stepper with finite incremental "steps" and detent torque.
Here's another one, it actually makes it sound like most steppers motors in use are in fact hybrid, I would guess Simagic motor as well.
Of course it doesn't feel like a ratchet but not as smooth as true servo kind. That has been observation from Barry and other participants of that comparison between different systems
And Barry directly commented on that in his other review
It's still a very nice entry DD system, and a huge step up from gear or belt driven wheels. Stepper or not.
This sentence from their site kinda puts it beyond doubt for me:
Yeah me too! There aren't many wheels that don't beat a G27Very nice catch. Hard to argue with that . No matter what type of motor, I think we all agree that having sub $1000 DD wheels is good for all of us. The Accuforce V2 gets great reviews across the board, and the Simagic seems to get mixed as of right now, but may come into its own. We do have to ask if the those are better than the upper end belt driven wheels as they are almost the same price. I am sporting a T300, so would love to have either one.
V1 vs V2, the only difference I could find was cost saving due to new enclosureThanks for the link. I believe the video you are referring to on the comparison was using the Accuforce V1 and not V2. He reviews the V2 about a year ago, and gives it praise.
If you watch Barry's second review (on the V2) he speaks to it being better than when he tested the V1. I can't speak to what may have changed. We may never know. It could be as simple as firmware or software changes. A firmware update alone made my rough transmission start shifting as smooth as silk .V1 vs V2, the only difference I could find was cost saving due to new enclosure
Feedback on $6500 Computer/VR/Sim Racing Build?
Hey yall from Texas! Background I have been following racing since I was a kid (when my dad flagged 1960s club sport racing and I got to watch lotus super 7s, formula fords, bugeye sprites, vettes, maserati birdcages, MGBs, etc racing in their different class races). I have always owned sports...www.racedepartment.com
Hi Ian, thanks for the advice.I have a fanatec Mclaren GT3 rim and a simagic base. USB conversion by Sim Racing Machines. I recommend them wholeheartedly, but they are based in the UK so I don't know what shipping would be like to Malaysia.
As far as QR goes, I would recommend using a D1 spec. They are identical except for the power pins (which you don't need for a non simagic rim anyway) and clip straight on to the simagic base. D1 spec QRs are available on ebay for about £20 less than the simagic version.
The USB conversion sits on the back of the rim and provides a 70mm PCD that will bolt straight on to either a simagic or D1 spec QR.
Hi Ian, did you purchase the Wheel base without a wheel?I have a fanatec Mclaren GT3 rim and a simagic base. USB conversion by Sim Racing Machines. I recommend them wholeheartedly, but they are based in the UK so I don't know what shipping would be like to Malaysia.
As far as QR goes, I would recommend using a D1 spec. They are identical except for the power pins (which you don't need for a non simagic rim anyway) and clip straight on to the simagic base. D1 spec QRs are available on ebay for about £20 less than the simagic version.
The USB conversion sits on the back of the rim and provides a 70mm PCD that will bolt straight on to either a simagic or D1 spec QR.
Hi Ian, did you purchase the Wheel base without a wheel?
if so did it come with the quick release?
i have preordered a base and am waiting for the delivery, I am unsure if I need to purchase a QR.