Thank you. Finally someone with balls to say what they think. Let's be serious for a moment then. I write these articles not for me, but for people who read them. I just wanted to try it out in Hockenheim, give some sort of funny/offensive review in a very specific writing style. Surprise, people loved it. Currently it has nearly 500 reads. Now think about how many people outside of FSR have been reached. I got so much positive feedback and responses, mostly private though as people are scared. So I obviously had to keep going. In the same style as this suits me the best. If i wrote politically correct reviews - as I have done in late 2010. I would bore myself to death. It had to be something different, something people would enjoy. I am really sorry that some of you feel offended by it. The main objective is just to keep it humorous and I don't think I would be able to deliver it on this level without being offensive. That's just me. That's why it is called politically incorrect and honestly said. I respect that you hate it and can't stand me. If you have any concerns regarding privacy, please write me a PM and I will fully adhere to your wishes. However I will not back off just because 4 or 5 people can't stand it. At the same time, while being offensive I try to keep it factuals and with some points.
So here are the points that people could be most offended about:
Commentators - what I really think: Jong did a great job when he was by himself, hes not a native speaker and he can express himself a lot better when commentating than on the forum, he has reasonable racing understanding to judge situations. However he lacks some basic facts and information, which some pre-race research would fix. Mundy: he has a very good commentating voice, clear expression. However he sometimes talks too much, and sometimes says very incorrect things, judges racing situation incorrectly and has been noticably biased favouring Morand. Again, pre-race research would help a lot with some facts.
Netrex - I don't choose to write about them because I hate them, I am fairly indifferent. I write about them because most of their drivers cause non-standard racing situations, to put it politically correct. Morand deserves this year's title, he was the best driver this year without a doubt. But at the same time had a lot of brain farts and mistakes that I wrote about of course.
de Wit - yes I honestly don't like that guy and I feel many of his actions, such as last year Hungary was completely intentional. He had many of these over the years. He has never learnt from his accidents and crashes. He had 1 year when he was fairly clean but since then dropped back to his standard which is a shame. If he was clean I would have no reason to write about him.
General negativism about other drivers/directors - if i was positive about everyone, it woulnd't make much sense would it? I need to point out mistakes and failures in a very sarcastic/ offensive way as, once again, that is the best way I can write. It is offensive, but so what? Are you kids that can't handle some humorous offense? I don't think I have written just pure offensive sentences or paragraphs, there was always something to point out in an amusing way. I fully respect that not everyone will like it but once again judging from the very positive feedback, most people do like it. Some articles more than others but I can't please everyone. If you have any constructive feedback and something to change, let me know.
Forum - I hope i don't need to explain that one. It is all entertainment and if you take it or yourself seriously then just chill and don't take it seriously for a while. World is too ****ed up place to be so serious. Furthermore it is enjoyable to create controversy when some people just can't understand. Take a chill pill and relax.
Finally a challenge. If you think you can write some fun, amusing FSR article, whether offensive or not. Go for it. FSR needs more coverage, more proper articles.