My 2 cents, there is some credibility to the reviewer. There are some issues still with the release which SMS are addressing. So is it perfect day 1? Nope. Will it be perfect after the first patch? Nope.
SMS will be continuing to address issues as well as enhance the platform over the next 2 or more years.
I will say that the reviewer purposely picked the worst scenarios to publish. It is a deliberate smear tactic but the issues he points out do exist. The vintage racing right not is not the best. Doing what he did, throwing the AI up to 100 and jumping in vintage open wheelers is just going to cause frustration. The AI is very aggressive at 100 and does not care about situational awareness. That level of AI works well with tintops that can stand a little banging, but not with the open wheelers, especially the vintage ones which need more cornering room.
Yey! Modern games, release something that we know isn't bug-free. Money! Then take more money for DLC! Meh. (A general meeeh, for modern game dev. not SMS)
He's doing what I like to do, highlight what's 'wrong' with the game, then it will be up to the guys watching to see if you accept the bugs and issues. If you can, buy. If you can't, don't buy.
I don't care how good stuff are, if there are bugs, issues or game-features that's bollocks.
Automated pit? In a sim?!? Aaand with a crash out of the pit!? That is a very small, but game-breaking thing for me.
And doesn't the AI have 2 sliders? One for speed, and one for aggressive? Just one, and the higher it is put, the faster, and more crazy they drive? Isn't that... stupid?
For the question of the thread. Wait, see what... independed people say, not the major game-sites who usually give good ratings unless the game is awful. And not people who is invested in it.