How do you know that? There were two front wings dumped on the track in the first lap.Missing chunk, hmmmm, sure, he never hit or was hit by something.
Because this is the F1 forum. Makes sense to talk about F1.Why is F1 being followed so closely here, but WEC and IMSA are almost never mentioned?
Because F1 is more popular and attract more people to the site, Makes more business sense to cover a the worlds most prestigious motorsports competition.
The point remains, even here articles about F1 are popular that by no means makes me think it's the best form of motprsport same can be said for anything F1 is to motorsport what Pop is to music. I really believe if Sky picked up the DTM for example created a moody advertisement, put some presenters in pink shirts (tucked in obviously) walked a camera backwards whilst the 3 middle class gentleman discussed all the happenings, they could have a huge influence on the ratings and opinions of the said motorsport. I kind of like the BTCC the average looking missus in the pit lane who just loves their motorsport fanatic husband it feels real.It is the famous chicken egg story, F1 is more popular so it gets more exposure, F1 is more popular because it gets more exposure. Everywhere I look it is F1, I have to search to find some other motorsport of interest and it is actually getting worse not bettter - unless I go for pay services, which are still very much biased towards F1.
Personally I haven’t been interested in F1 for decades, IMO it get far too much attention as it is to the detriment of motorsports in general.
...not a hater, lets make that clear.
It is the famous chicken egg story, F1 is more popular so it gets more exposure, F1 is more popular because it gets more exposure. Everywhere I look it is F1, I have to search to find some other motorsport of interest and it is actually getting worse not bettter - unless I go for pay services, which are still very much biased towards F1. There are now +10 F1 related items in row on RD.
Personally I haven’t been interested in F1 for decades, IMO it get far too much attention as it is to the detriment of motorsports in general.
...not a hater, lets make that clear.
Sure, are there any photos going around of this supposed damage? Unless there is proof it is just words.Because thats not what happened? He had damage and it was pretty obvious, im not saying he wouldve won this race because he got jumped at the start after Valterris great start and Valterri drove an amazing race, but no way would he have been 25 seconds off the lead so im not sure why you think that gap was all down to driver skill. Lewis was even complaining about the balance in the race so its obviously not right. Valterri deserved the win today but by no means are mercedes making up excuses for Hamilton being 25 seconds behind, he did have damage.
I can tell you why, what is Imsa?Why is F1 being followed so closely here, but WEC and IMSA are almost never mentioned?
LolA piece of his ego fell off, when his "captain slow" teammate was outpacing him. That damaged the floor.
How do I know? Because we would have heard all about and seen it during the race coverage. Hamilton gets a lot of airtime, it would have been all over the coverage if something like that happened.How do you know that? There were two front wings dumped on the track in the first lap.
Because this is the F1 forum. Makes sense to talk about F1.
I don't think Mercedes would need to come up with excuses for Hamilton, they're just stating what happened.
It must be slightly alarming for the other teams that a damaged Mercedes is capable of taking 2nd and Bottas was untouchable.
Yes. There is a picture of the car at the end of the race with a missing piece, and one that show that that part was there at the beginning of the race.Sure, are there any photos going around of this supposed damage? Unless there is proof it is just words.
Even Hamilton said himself that irrespective of what the problem was that he lost the race already in the first corner and this is quoted by him.Missing chunk, hmmmm, sure, he never hit or was hit by something. Why can't they just admit that he was actually outdriven on the day!!
Yes, I just posted it above.Sure, are there any photos going around of this supposed damage? Unless there is proof it is just words.
There's probably a lot of truth to that. I think part of the problem is the car itself isn't as amazing to the average person as it once was. If you go back to any time before the 1990s in motorsport and people didn't have to have a huge interest in the sport side of racing they could go to enjoy seeing incredible machines that you couldn't see anywhere else doing things that seemed impossible.The point remains, even here articles about F1 are popular that by no means makes me think it's the best form of motprsport same can be said for anything F1 is to motorsport what Pop is to music.
View attachment 297102 There's a picture for everyone calling bs
Incase there's the how did you know it wasnt there at race start.
Hands down to Bottas. As much as i am a HAM fan, i dont think he would have passed Bottas in the race. Bottas was on song, Lewis will have his hands full this year. I really hope Bottas can challenge like this and keep Lewis honest for the rest of the season.
What i really want to see though, is a 3 way battle between Bottas, Verstappen and LeClerc.
View attachment 297102 There's a picture for everyone calling bs