Dux
Simracer since 99 / 3D Engineer & Game Developer
You know what I find a bit of a mystery?
When Michael went to Ferrari and helped to re-built that team from a car that was throwing half-shaft in pit-lane to becoming the most dominant car on the grid, nobody questioned his ability or said it was 'the car'
When Vettel received the revolutionary design of Adrian Newey...a 'slippery' car that could use less power because of cutting edge aero to gap the field by multiple seconds, nobody said it was 'the car'.
Nike convinces Lewis to join Mercedes from McLaren....in a car that 'chewed' through its rear tires every few laps.
That car has now been developed into a great track car with Lewis, who'd beaten everybody... in every category before coming to F1 and yet suddenly, it is the car.
While there is now...and never could be an answer for who is the outright best driver in F1, some folks need to get a reality grip...and quickly.
Might I suggest you get off the 'hate and jealousy' train and go watch his racing in earlier category, before coming here spouting nonsense.
You think like that because, in truth you are not very much informed.
Michael did improved the car and helped BIG TIME in creating the Ferrari that it was. However I remember my older cousins stopped watching F1 because to them it was boring and Michael won because of the car. True he had strong car but there was still competition.
Vettel did not just received the "Newey designs" as if that is some special weapon for mass destruction - he worked on it, day and night. He came into that team and brought that car to a victory in only 3/4 races while they have been trying for 5 seasons with much more experienced drivers and the same designer. With same designers that they had before, with same engine they had before. One thing changed - Vettel came in. Speaking back on the "revolutionary design of Newey" , to continue my thought from above - Sebastian Vettel was able to exploit the potential of that car, worked the most and was the only one from the grid who actually cared to visit Pirelli. That is the reason why Vettel won 4 titles while Webber never finished the season as vice-champion, although he was allowed to race Vettel - in the same car. And yes, many people said he was winning because of the car too - anyway there was competition.
Third thing - Lewis Hamilton.
I will be short and if you are interested I can go on in second post - Lewis Hamilton was contacted at the end of 2012 by Niki Lauda who told him the whole program and what was going on behind the scenes and the strong engine they had developed for 2014 Hybrid era. Lewis was perfectly aware where he is going. Lewis got it, we can easily say it, on silver plate basically. He didn't helped much. If anyone ever did in this engine ruled era, it was Schumacher who aligned the structure with Ross Brawn years before. And for 6 years there is no competition.
[EDIT] I don't want to be misunderstood. I respect Hamilton a lot. I don't put it all his success on the car. I'd say he deserved it, maybe not everything, but 2/3 titles maybe 4 yes. He is great and for me most naturally talented driver on the grid. However the car is just too damn good and he got it just too damn easy. And in that context, hearing Toto claim he is probably the greatest ever, makes me laugh. Apart of the laugh, it is sheer arrogance and I hope very very soon they feel how it is to race from behind without any chance of winning. What has been pretty much for the rest of the grid for 6 years. Except Ferrari some 20 races out of these, 6x20...120 races.
Last edited: