D
Deleted member 197115
-
Deleted member 197115
Interesting analysis, what do you think
It is ACC 1.0.5Are you sure this is ACC, looks like AC to me?
Looks the same to me, what was the point of moving to different graphics engine that only adds poor performance.It is ACC 1.0.5
I did this test last evening to evaluate WMR performance with my Ryzen 5-2600X and Nvidia' 435.27 driver for Win10.
Thirdly, I think one of ACCs bad points he missed is performance. If you have a good PC, ACC runs fine, but for those of us with older PCs (mine is 2.5 years old) it doesn't.
I find there are many similarities with PC2: unripe product and many disappointed expectations.
I don't feel the development of the game was really geared towards the PC. It functions on it, but Its missing on core aspects of PC sims (triples, vr, UI). The resentment mostly comes from that. Console folks will be happy though.
Looks the same to me, what was the point of moving to different graphics engine that only adds poor performance.
Huh?There is no reason to think UE4 is inherently performing "worse" than AC1 engine. UE4 engine is industry standard and built by hundreds of people that were experts in their field, AC1 engine was built by a couple of Kunos dudes who most likely were not experts in computer game graphics. If UE4 engine was inherently poorly optimized then no game would be using it. If they attempted to run all the new graphics features they have now on the old AC1 engine it would almost certainly run worse than ACC.
Consoles are the big pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. They are certainly gearing towards a console release and all the menus in the game kind of point to that fact.I'd be very surprised if ACC was being geared towards consoles.
Get rich fast tip - start releasing DLCs for AC.
A Blancpain GT pack for AC would sell so well
ACC never had the pick numbers of original Assetto Corsa. And what is worse is that AC have more people playing today than ACC.
AC is old, a product from 2013 or 2014 and still is more appealing than ACC.
It is obvious to me, Kunos have to learn something from this.
ACC now seems to me some kind of Race from Simbin, the game that begins the decline of SimBin. Hope that not happens with Kunos.
It would be very nice, but I have many doubts because bringing the improvements obtained in ACC to AC would require a lot of work on all cars/mods.Stefano hinted a while back possibility of porting some physics improvement to AC at a later time, ....
Looks the same to me, what was the point of moving to different graphics engine that only adds poor performance.
May be not vanilla, but with CSP and SOL AC does look even better than ACC, esp in VR.Really?
If it means that the FFB turns into what ACC has currently, then no thanks. Don't touch AC.Stefano hinted a while back possibility of porting some physics improvement to AC at a later time, obviously team is up to ears busy with ACC at the moment.
But with current state of modded AC, it's a touchy subject.
"Breaking news" Bludyshev discusses "crushes" on the BBC and tells us all some useless information.As for crushes and bad optimisation, I don't really get what people are complaining about. I play on a gaming laptop with 1060 and i7, connected to the monitor, and do not have any crushes and fps drops. The game always maintains steady 60 fps with 30 people online