According to google, the weight distribution of the KTM XBOX R is 38/62,
38% front
68% back
Lets suppose you have spring rate that has an ideal natural frequency
Car engineer, Dev app:
F:1.8Hz R. 3.3Hz
Basically you always want to keep about that ratio when adjusting the spring rate:
So the back need about 162% of the rate than the front
The back end is about 38% of the front
When you change the stiffness, always keep about that ratio.
Dampers bump front 1
Dampers rebound front 8
Dampers bump rear 6
Dampers rebound rear 4
Both front damping has a gap of 1 at the very upper end of the spring & the back damping has a gap of 2 which is about the mid center. The default value has a gap of 2 for both end, which suggest the car has anti squat & got the damping at the upper range of the front spring & the lower middle range of the rear spring.
Without any anti squat whatsoever, the damping rate should be higher by 162% at the front which technically should have a range of 1 instead of 2.
Some car suspension geometry has anti squat geometry
If you increase the rear height, it reduce the effect of anti squat. It allow the rear suspension to compress more during acceleration & get reduced compression at the front. I suppose changing the range downward for the front while retaining the gap & the opposite going upward for the rear(maybe increase range) maybe make sense by changing the angle of the car.
It's all supposition, it could be complete nonsense.
With this car on default with simply adjusting the tire pressure, you can easily beat the AI. Although it always fascinating to play with the setup.
38% front
68% back
Lets suppose you have spring rate that has an ideal natural frequency
Car engineer, Dev app:
F:1.8Hz R. 3.3Hz
Basically you always want to keep about that ratio when adjusting the spring rate:
So the back need about 162% of the rate than the front
The back end is about 38% of the front
When you change the stiffness, always keep about that ratio.
Dampers bump front 1
Dampers rebound front 8
Dampers bump rear 6
Dampers rebound rear 4
Both front damping has a gap of 1 at the very upper end of the spring & the back damping has a gap of 2 which is about the mid center. The default value has a gap of 2 for both end, which suggest the car has anti squat & got the damping at the upper range of the front spring & the lower middle range of the rear spring.
Without any anti squat whatsoever, the damping rate should be higher by 162% at the front which technically should have a range of 1 instead of 2.
Some car suspension geometry has anti squat geometry
If you increase the rear height, it reduce the effect of anti squat. It allow the rear suspension to compress more during acceleration & get reduced compression at the front. I suppose changing the range downward for the front while retaining the gap & the opposite going upward for the rear(maybe increase range) maybe make sense by changing the angle of the car.
It's all supposition, it could be complete nonsense.
With this car on default with simply adjusting the tire pressure, you can easily beat the AI. Although it always fascinating to play with the setup.