If you bought the NX6000
D model then yes it has the DSP features.
HELP = Amp DSP Settings Info
Lots of detailed info here to help get you started.
You need to help and learn/experience yourself, how making changes within the CROSSOVER filtering and EQ alter your BK output. With some messing around you will grasp what and how it changes things.
Yet you can also learn to feel at what point the large BK also tend to drop off in felt immersion as these units have most benefit with lower bass and bring much more energy and immersion to these than small transducers or indeed the Mini BK units as they just simply cannot re-create the same sensations with the lowest frequencies regardless of what wattage/amp is used
While the large BK with DSP can bring very nice low bass energy and immersion, it still leaves potential in other ways that can be adopted into a build.
The best approach for low bass but also detail is to use an installation that can use both a large BK and then either the recommended (40w Thruster) exciters discussed on these forums as a concept I am pushing people towards experimenting with. The alternative is to use a Clark Synthesis TST model as secondary units but these are quite expensive if going beyond the entry-level T209 unit.
Why?
The large BK seem the best for low bass, but they run with only minor detail beyond the 60-80Hz range
Yet with the exciters and the TST units we can use them as secondary units to bring much better detail from the 30-200Hz range. Look at it like having a woofer and midrange unit but us covering the full bass range. A single unit will also struggle to produce detail with scenarios like several effects or more advanced effects that contain multiple layers for specific sensations. We can split the frequencies of effects that they go to specific units suited better for their reproduction.
This approach of
not just relying on the BK units can greatly extend the felt sensation possible as well as the detail for much richer immersion and the ability to then create and apply more impressive effects design and specific layers or effect roles to specific units.
This "Dual Role" method is worth experimenting with and especially for effects that are active for longer periods or are more consistent. RPM and SPEED in how we can apply both of these to work together and bringing from very low Hz output for high energy low bass but also then for adding more zing and life/sparkle to higher rpm sensations. Experimentation with this is good self-learning and using or how you apply a suitable crossover and your preference of filtering.
Filtering has a big impact on how a unit responds. We can apply gain and a curve for a unit to operate over with the DSP controls.
Then we can use EQ within that curve to apply specific cuts/boost to targetted frequencies. For example large BK suit having a drop in amplitude with EQ @20-25Hz as this region can cause piston pang. Yet we may want to boost that 5-10Hz a lot and have it fall gradually to a range we want the unit to work within. Over 60Hz you will likely feel limited gains in response with the large BK and when applying boost.
This thread (which you have seen) tried to get owners to discuss settings and help people learn how to achieve more performance from their large BK by using DSP. Pay attention to the diagrams showing very different examples of crossover filtering. I recommend you try options like that too.
Like several threads, I have tried it failed with little participation or interest.
Few people are interested in (Tactile) to the level I am which is understandable but its an area I think much can still be improved or learned and I know I still have more things to share and learn yet myself that my own build will highlight in the future.
I attempted at various times and places to encourage others to get involved and offer their own collective feedback. To have a discussion, or indeed debate over differences in opinions/preferences or approaches. I was offering feedback from findings I spent a lot of time with testing and then showcasing and sharing these so others could then share their own findings and people then compare or use such methods myself or others were offering.
The fact is, based on the evidence from limited responses of others, you will find hardly any posts of people coming back giving their own input and information on their own tests and findings or indeed them sharing settings. I can say this after trying several threads over the last 2 years.
Simvibe has not really had any major updates in many years and we can do much more now with Simhub than Simvibe. I would only recommend Simvibe for any specific sim that may offer as good effects support than Simhub (if any).
Simhub is not restricted to CM & EM modes or needing more than 1 soundcard to use with more than 4 transducers. It also can support an unlimited number of channels and soundcards.
