Stages, Rallycross, Performance: Why Our Community Still Prefers DiRT Rally 2.0 Over EA Sports WRC

Cover Image.jpg
Monte Carlo Rally, DiRT Rally 2.0. Image: codemasters
Without a doubt, EA Sports WRC and DiRT Rally 2.0 are the two heavy hitters in modern rally titles. But interestingly, our community question last week showed that you prefer the older title - so we look at why our community still loves DiRT Rally 2.0.

On paper, it should be a clear win for EA Sports WRC versus DiRT Rally 2.0: It is newer, has the 2023 and 2024 WRC seasons plus plenty of historic content on board, has longer stages and more choice for locations - and yet, things not always as straight-forward as one might think.

In a previous article on this subject, there were ample conversations in the comments about which sim is best. The poll that was attached showed that a larger percentage of those readers preferred DiRT Rally 2.0 over WRC. In that article, we looked at both title's reputations as well as their features. Here is why DiRT Rally 2.0 is the preferred rally sim over WRC according to our community.

Poll Results
EA Sports WRC: 31%
DiRT Rally 2.0: 57.4%
Other Titles: 11.6%

Ford.jpg

M-Sport Ford in EA Sports WRC. Image: EA Sports

Content​

The main topic of conversation and debate in the comments section of our previous article was the content differences between the two titles, and Richard Burns Rally as well.

The car choice is nicely balanced across both titles, however, contemporary cars are where WRC shines. DiRT Rally 2.0 has an almost endless list of DLC cars that cost as little as €2 that spice up the car list. The base game list is also impressive so regardless of which sim you prefer you get a nice variety.

Junior WRC.jpg

Junior WRC class. Image: EA Sports

WRC has a big lead on DiRT Rally 2.0 when it comes to stages and rally lengths, as mentioned in the previous article. However, a lot of the community was more interested in how it feels to drive these stages and how these titles handle them, of course.

"For me the bad thing about WRC, is that in lifeless compare to Dirt Rally 2.0. It needs to improve. The stages need more life and immersion, they must bring random events to the game. I don't know if they can bring ERC and WRX to the game, but at least they need to include the Special Stages, so we can have more depth to the game and some similar to Dirt Rally 2.0 and of course a Free Roam option, Dirt Fish place should make a return." - WerferHarfer

The WRC fans love the variety in stages, whereas the DiRT Rally 2.0 fans appear to prefer the driving feel of their sim and are willing to sacrifice up-to-date cars. The other big issue is the EA anti-cheat that so many people oppose, so much so that they have uninstalled the game entirely or cannot start it anymore.

C4 Rally.jpg

Citroen C4 sideways in Sweden. Image: Codemasters

Graphics & System Requirements​

The graphical differences between WRC and DiRT Rally 2.0 are obvious in some places, but very slight in others. There are certainly some big surprises, and the older DiRT Rally 2.0 is certainly not to be dismissed - neither are the struggles of WRC related to the Unreal Engine it uses.

Before comparing the graphics, let's take a look into the system requirements to run both of these titles at a good framerate without sacrificing the graphical detail. OverTake user Rodger Davies explained his experience with WRC and why he prefers DiRT Rally 2.0 very eloquently in the comments section of the community question article:

"For me, if I was recommending a new user: DR2

I couldn't play WRC because of the crazy stuttering for the first few months. It does now (as of Oct '24) seem to be resolved, but even if it is I have a problem that WRC doesn't have game modes I want to play.

In DR2 I loved the career championships - the AI was well done and crucially there was no clutter like the WRC one seems to. And best of all, the season's events were truly randomised. With WRC, not even the stages within the events are random; they apparently follow the same order each year. Even with the '24 DLC, there's a single fixed calendar. WRC also only really has a career for the three modern classes, the historic classes are sidelined.

OK, so career isn't for me; solo play. But in solo play rallies or championships I can't select the classes. So if I want to role play Vatanen's Escort or Alen's Fiat 131 I have to run 60th on the road with fully rutted stages behind a load of Group B and Group A cars. How hard would it be to have a toggle to turn off multi class?

Last resort; dailies. I loved the 'you have one shot' approach in DR2 to these... but no, they're gone. Replaced by a 'moments' stage which, ironically, you can run over and over.

The UI is also much worse IMO - DR2's menu was great in its simplicity, big blocks and a consistent approach throughout. WRC one I find inconsistent by comparison (and I turned the music off, which I never did in DR1 or 2).

Back to graphics for a sec... WRC has made the switch but it looks far worse for the performance. The water effect of rain and splashes is poor compared to DR2. In DR2 cars got caked in mud whereas I can run a wet Kenyan stage in WRC and the car still looks cleaner than the Skoda in my driveway.

But, importantly WRC has better tarmac handling and far more stage mileage. I like having the choice for a female codriver and some of the car list is truly inspired, such as the Talbot Sunbeam and Hillman Avenger (although some terrible class groupings remain, like the Stratos bundled with Group A cars instead of the other '70s machines). That said, DR2 had the superb RGT class, which is one of my favourites - it's such a pity we can't combine these with WRC's tarmac handling.

WRC's DLC structure adding new stages to existing locations to further increase the unique KMs of events like Monte Carlo and Portugal is great too, this is something DR2 lacks, and having 60km of unique stage for some countries makes a huge difference compared to the older game." - Rodger Davies

Below is a table comparing the recommended hardware for running these two rally simulators. Rally is one of the hardest disciplines of motorsport for your computer to run and process because it requires loading data for just a few seconds at a time as you fly through a dense Australian forest or along a high-speed Polish backroad.

System Requirements

Hardware EA Sports WRCDiRT Rally 2.0
Operating SystemWindows 10 or 1164bit versions of either Windows 7, 8 or 10
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 7 3700X Intel i5 10600KAMD Ryzen 5 2600X or Intel Core i5 8600K
Memory16 GB RAM8 GB RAM
GraphicsNvidia RTX 2070 Radeon RX 5700 XTAMD RX Vega 56 or NVIDIA GTX 1070
DirectXVersion 12Version 11
Storage110 GB available space + SSD recommended100 GB available space
VROpenXR, Meta Quest 3, Meta Quest 2, Meta Quest Pro, Valve Index, Oculus Rift S, Oculus CV1, HTC ViveSteamVR or Oculus PC
Sound CardDirectX CompatibleDirectX® Compatible soundcard
System requirements on Steam as of October 2024

Starting with WRC, the recommended system requirements are much more equipment-heavy compared to DiRT Rally 2.0. This may be down to the fact that WRC is over four years newer than its competition, however, DiRT Rally 2.0 does not let itself down graphically, so which one is better?

"As I am not able to run EA Sports WRC due to the AVX lock (really should be specified on Steam’s mininal requirements, as my CPU is far better spec than the one mentioned on Steam, it only doesn’t support AVX), it’s DR2 then. I also like the old rallycross. I would love to be able to play EA Sports WRC, because I love the roster of classic cars (from 90s)." - Kulibob

It all comes down to what you want from your sim. If you have a lower-end computer and a loss of graphical detail is inevitable, I would recommend going with DiRT Rally 2.0. However, if you love licensed content and want to drive your favourite WRC cars in amazing detail, EA Sports WRC is the way to go in this match-up.

OverTake user, RayMy, described his experience with WRC on his hardware:
"For me, EA WRC works perfectly smoothly on my PC, even after adding anti-cheat. I don't have the game on the C: system drive, but on the E: drive. I play in 4K with DLSS balanced and almost everything on ultra settings except shadows, post process and reflection on medium. Mirror off.

My PC is: Win 10, Ryzen 5 3600, 32gb RAM, RTX 3060 Ti 8gb and nvme ssd drives"
- Raymy


Kadett.jpg

Opel Kadett C GT/E Image: Codemasters

Rallycross​

Whilst being a point of conversation not related to the core disciplines of both games, Rallycross is a much-loved discipline amongst rally fans like OverTake users JorritVD and Alexandre Costa. The lack thereof in WRC is a major sticking point for a lot of players who were considering switching from DiRT Rally 2.0.

"Well, I've been looking for a rally sim lately, as I started doing some rallycross on AMS 2 and iRacing and that made me want some "real" rally. I'll probably buy both and try for less than 2 hours and make a decision as I don't like having games I don't play." - Alexandre Costa

The issues are within the licensing of the two titles. WRC focuses on real-life WRC cars and teams, so having rallycross in the title does not make much sense from a licensing perspective. However, that is where DiRT Rally 2.0 shines. You can race on eight official circuits from the FIA World Rallycross championship, complete with licensed cars and support series.

Peugeot 205.jpg

Peugeot 205 T16 Rallycross. Image: Codemasters

To further DiRT Rally 2.0's dominance within Rallycross, there is an entire career mode centred around the mode with its licensed circuits and cars. This sets the title apart from its competition and is the obvious choice for new and experienced players who have tried rallycross in something like Project Cars 2 or iRacing and want to try a licensed version of this crazy racing discipline.

Overall, the split of content and quality is healthy and there is a solid fanbase for both titles. DiRT Rally 2.0 came out on top in our poll, but that does not mean that you should stop playing WRC. Play what you enjoy playing and what you get the most enjoyment out of - which is key to sim racing happiness, after all.

With the poll showing DiRT Rally 2.0 was more popular, what would you want to see added or removed from EA Sports WRC in the future to catch up with its competition? Let us know in the comments below!
About author
Connor Minniss
Website Content Editor & Motorsport Photographer aiming to bring you the best of the best within the world of sim racing.

Comments

In terms of different modes, keep in mind the DiRT series didn’t only have Rally and RallyCross, but also Rally Raid, Landrush (trucks on dirt circuits), Trailblazer (hillclimbs that became PikesPeak in DR1), Gymkhana and a lot of online stuff, like Infected, Transporter and so on. At some points there also were Gate Crashers and Last Man Standing. The content was endless. Everything will be missing something today…
 
Last edited:
@Connor Minniss please can you update my quote in the OP? I wrote it in a fit of pique and have tempered my language and added a bit more balance.

For the record, WRC is on sale on Steam at the moment and I strongly recommend trying it. I gave it another chance to try the new stages and check my experience from the OP and I'm happy to say the performance bugs have gone. I'm happy to say the Poland stages in particular are some of the best in the game and it seems the EA team has gotten an improved understanding in how to design and optimise the stages.

I don't miss rallycross at all and one of WRC's selling points to me is a more focused rally game.
Can you tell me if Poland and Latvia? Are involved into the career mode? Or are they only available in another modes ?
That’s the key question for me if I should get the newest dlc update or not
 
I just do not care about long stages and graphics. I play all three (RBR, EA WRC, DR2) but DR2 is the best mix of everything for me.
 
Can you tell me if Poland and Latvia? Are involved into the career mode? Or are they only available in another modes ?
That’s the key question for me if I should get the newest dlc update or not

Yes they are involved in the career mode.

However, not through any dynamic calendar, they just replace the 2023 calendar with the 2024 one. Which is nonsense IMO. So Estonia and Mexico drop out of any WRC season.

For me, they need to at least rotate the calendars in career, although better would be having an element of randomisation in them (maybe a few fixed events and some rotating ones).
 
Yes they are involved in the career mode.

However, not through any dynamic calendar, they just replace the 2023 calendar with the 2024 one. Which is nonsense IMO. So Estonia and Mexico drop out of any WRC season.

For me, they need to at least rotate the calendars in career, although better would be having an element of randomisation in them (maybe a few fixed events and some rotating ones).
OMG you´re right. Thats a bloody bad design decision...
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Connor Minniss
Article read time
5 min read
Views
2,655
Comments
26
Last update

Shifting method

  • I use whatever the car has in real life*

  • I always use paddleshift

  • I always use sequential

  • I always use H-shifter

  • Something else, please explain


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top